Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review

Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to capture the reported definitions for the subtypes of neglect post stroke and map the range of assessment tools employed for each neglect subtype.Methods: EMBASE, Emcare, Medline, and psychINFO were searched from database inception. Searching inc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lindy J. Williams, Jocelyn Kernot, Susan L. Hillier, Tobias Loetscher
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	perceptual disorders stroke patient outcome assessment neuropsychological test spatial neglect neglect Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/aed259acef414423bc712afa9567174a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:aed259acef414423bc712afa9567174a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:aed259acef414423bc712afa9567174a2021-11-30T17:36:16ZSpatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review1664-229510.3389/fneur.2021.742365https://doaj.org/article/aed259acef414423bc712afa9567174a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.742365/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-2295Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to capture the reported definitions for the subtypes of neglect post stroke and map the range of assessment tools employed for each neglect subtype.Methods: EMBASE, Emcare, Medline, and psychINFO were searched from database inception. Searching included all allied terms and mesh headings for stroke, spatial neglect, measurement, screening tools, psychometric properties. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. Primary studies with documented protocols of a spatial neglect tool for adults post stroke, with some aspect of validity or reliability were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed the documented protocols of each tool to determine the underlying subtypes and disagreements were resolved through discussion.Results: There were 371 articles included with 292 tools used for the screening or diagnosis of neglect. The majority of studies (67%) included a tool that did not specify the neglect subtype being assessed, therefore an analysis of the underlying subtypes for each tool is presented.Conclusions: There is no consistency with the terms used to refer to the syndrome of spatial neglect with over 200 different terms used within the included studies to refer to the syndrome as a whole or one of its subtypes. It is essential to unify the terminology and definition for each neglect subtype. There are hundreds of neglect tools available, however many are not able to differentiate presenting subtypes. It is important for clinicians and researchers to critically evaluate the neglect tools being used for the screening and diagnosis of neglect.Lindy J. WilliamsLindy J. WilliamsLindy J. WilliamsJocelyn KernotSusan L. HillierSusan L. HillierTobias LoetscherTobias LoetscherFrontiers Media S.A.articleperceptual disordersstrokepatient outcome assessmentneuropsychological testspatial neglectneglectNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENFrontiers in Neurology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	perceptual disorders stroke patient outcome assessment neuropsychological test spatial neglect neglect Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429
spellingShingle	perceptual disorders stroke patient outcome assessment neuropsychological test spatial neglect neglect Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Jocelyn Kernot Susan L. Hillier Susan L. Hillier Tobias Loetscher Tobias Loetscher Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
description	Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to capture the reported definitions for the subtypes of neglect post stroke and map the range of assessment tools employed for each neglect subtype.Methods: EMBASE, Emcare, Medline, and psychINFO were searched from database inception. Searching included all allied terms and mesh headings for stroke, spatial neglect, measurement, screening tools, psychometric properties. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. Primary studies with documented protocols of a spatial neglect tool for adults post stroke, with some aspect of validity or reliability were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed the documented protocols of each tool to determine the underlying subtypes and disagreements were resolved through discussion.Results: There were 371 articles included with 292 tools used for the screening or diagnosis of neglect. The majority of studies (67%) included a tool that did not specify the neglect subtype being assessed, therefore an analysis of the underlying subtypes for each tool is presented.Conclusions: There is no consistency with the terms used to refer to the syndrome of spatial neglect with over 200 different terms used within the included studies to refer to the syndrome as a whole or one of its subtypes. It is essential to unify the terminology and definition for each neglect subtype. There are hundreds of neglect tools available, however many are not able to differentiate presenting subtypes. It is important for clinicians and researchers to critically evaluate the neglect tools being used for the screening and diagnosis of neglect.
format	article
author	Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Jocelyn Kernot Susan L. Hillier Susan L. Hillier Tobias Loetscher Tobias Loetscher
author_facet	Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Lindy J. Williams Jocelyn Kernot Susan L. Hillier Susan L. Hillier Tobias Loetscher Tobias Loetscher
author_sort	Lindy J. Williams
title	Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
title_short	Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
title_full	Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr	Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed	Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review
title_sort	spatial neglect subtypes, definitions and assessment tools: a scoping review
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/aed259acef414423bc712afa9567174a
work_keys_str_mv	AT lindyjwilliams spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT lindyjwilliams spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT lindyjwilliams spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT jocelynkernot spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT susanlhillier spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT susanlhillier spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT tobiasloetscher spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview AT tobiasloetscher spatialneglectsubtypesdefinitionsandassessmenttoolsascopingreview
_version_	1718406402450391040

Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review

Ejemplares similares