Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.

<h4>Objectives</h4>Whereas the importance of family history (FH) is widely recognized in cardiovascular risk assessment, its full potential could be underutilized, when applied with its current simple guidelines-based definition (cFH): presence of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caroline M Van daele, Tim De Meyer, Marc L De Buyzere, Thierry C Gillebert, Simon L I J Denil, Sofie Bekaert, Julio A Chirinos, Patrick Segers, Guy G De Backer, Dirk De Bacquer, Ernst R Rietzschel, Asklepios Investigators
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/aeeaf38d494849048eb912fa299fa251
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:aeeaf38d494849048eb912fa299fa251
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:aeeaf38d494849048eb912fa299fa2512021-11-18T07:47:00ZAddition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0063185https://doaj.org/article/aeeaf38d494849048eb912fa299fa2512013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23658806/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objectives</h4>Whereas the importance of family history (FH) is widely recognized in cardiovascular risk assessment, its full potential could be underutilized, when applied with its current simple guidelines-based definition (cFH): presence of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a first-degree relative. We tested the added value of a new, extended family history definition (eFH), also taking into account later onset of disease, second-degree relatives and number of affected relatives, on profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population.<h4>Design</h4>Longitudinal population study.<h4>Setting</h4>Random, representative population sample from Erpe-Mere and Nieuwerkerken (Belgium, primary care).<h4>Subjects</h4>2524 male/female volunteers, aged 35-55 years, free from overt CVD.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Subjects were extensively phenotyped including presence of atherosclerosis (ultrasound) and a newly developed FH questionnaire (4 generations).<h4>Results</h4>Compared to cFH, eFH was superior in predicting an adverse risk profile (glycemic state, elevated blood pressure, lipid abnormalities, presence of metabolic syndrome components) and presence of atherosclerosis (all age & sex-adjusted p<0.05). Unlike cFH, eFH remained a significant predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis after adjusting for confounders. Most relations with eFH were not graded but showed clear informational breakpoints, with absence of CVD (including late onset) in any first-degree relative being a negative predictor of atherosclerosis, and a particularly interesting phenotype for further study.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A novel, extended FH definition is superior to the conventional definition in profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. There remain clear opportunities to refine and increase the performance and informational content of this simple, readily-available inexpensive tool.Caroline M Van daeleTim De MeyerMarc L De BuyzereThierry C GillebertSimon L I J DenilSofie BekaertJulio A ChirinosPatrick SegersGuy G De BackerDirk De BacquerErnst R RietzschelAsklepios InvestigatorsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 5, p e63185 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Caroline M Van daele
Tim De Meyer
Marc L De Buyzere
Thierry C Gillebert
Simon L I J Denil
Sofie Bekaert
Julio A Chirinos
Patrick Segers
Guy G De Backer
Dirk De Bacquer
Ernst R Rietzschel
Asklepios Investigators
Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
description <h4>Objectives</h4>Whereas the importance of family history (FH) is widely recognized in cardiovascular risk assessment, its full potential could be underutilized, when applied with its current simple guidelines-based definition (cFH): presence of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a first-degree relative. We tested the added value of a new, extended family history definition (eFH), also taking into account later onset of disease, second-degree relatives and number of affected relatives, on profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population.<h4>Design</h4>Longitudinal population study.<h4>Setting</h4>Random, representative population sample from Erpe-Mere and Nieuwerkerken (Belgium, primary care).<h4>Subjects</h4>2524 male/female volunteers, aged 35-55 years, free from overt CVD.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Subjects were extensively phenotyped including presence of atherosclerosis (ultrasound) and a newly developed FH questionnaire (4 generations).<h4>Results</h4>Compared to cFH, eFH was superior in predicting an adverse risk profile (glycemic state, elevated blood pressure, lipid abnormalities, presence of metabolic syndrome components) and presence of atherosclerosis (all age & sex-adjusted p<0.05). Unlike cFH, eFH remained a significant predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis after adjusting for confounders. Most relations with eFH were not graded but showed clear informational breakpoints, with absence of CVD (including late onset) in any first-degree relative being a negative predictor of atherosclerosis, and a particularly interesting phenotype for further study.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A novel, extended FH definition is superior to the conventional definition in profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. There remain clear opportunities to refine and increase the performance and informational content of this simple, readily-available inexpensive tool.
format article
author Caroline M Van daele
Tim De Meyer
Marc L De Buyzere
Thierry C Gillebert
Simon L I J Denil
Sofie Bekaert
Julio A Chirinos
Patrick Segers
Guy G De Backer
Dirk De Bacquer
Ernst R Rietzschel
Asklepios Investigators
author_facet Caroline M Van daele
Tim De Meyer
Marc L De Buyzere
Thierry C Gillebert
Simon L I J Denil
Sofie Bekaert
Julio A Chirinos
Patrick Segers
Guy G De Backer
Dirk De Bacquer
Ernst R Rietzschel
Asklepios Investigators
author_sort Caroline M Van daele
title Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
title_short Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
title_full Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
title_fullStr Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
title_full_unstemmed Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study.
title_sort addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. the asklepios study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/aeeaf38d494849048eb912fa299fa251
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinemvandaele additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT timdemeyer additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT marcldebuyzere additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT thierrycgillebert additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT simonlijdenil additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT sofiebekaert additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT julioachirinos additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT patricksegers additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT guygdebacker additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT dirkdebacquer additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT ernstrrietzschel additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
AT asklepiosinvestigators additionofanovelprotectivefamilyhistorycategoryallowsbetterprofilingofcardiovascularriskandatheroscleroticburdeninthegeneralpopulationtheasklepiosstudy
_version_ 1718422994678710272