Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources

Research on the effects of medical news stories on the public has demonstrated that consumers make decisions about personal health care options and choices sometimes exclusively based on stories published by the media. Given the news media’s ability to set the agenda for what the lay public, governm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Patrizia Furlan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/aefe70e529d142ed92b42d795a2e1b0c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:aefe70e529d142ed92b42d795a2e1b0c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:aefe70e529d142ed92b42d795a2e1b0c2021-12-02T10:18:46ZWho can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources10.24135/pjr.v18i2.2671023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/aefe70e529d142ed92b42d795a2e1b0c2012-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/267https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035Research on the effects of medical news stories on the public has demonstrated that consumers make decisions about personal health care options and choices sometimes exclusively based on stories published by the media. Given the news media’s ability to set the agenda for what the lay public, government policymakers and even health professionals consider topical and important, medical news reporting has an added sense of responsibility to be timely, reliable and accurate. Public relations practitioners involved in medical promotion can be the behind-the-scenes providers of information and access to important sources in medical news production. This relationship has been an emerging area of research focus in the US but has received scant attention in Australia. Just as in other areas of reporting, the relational dynamics between reporter and PR source are often conflicting and contradictory. This article will explore the views of 25 Australian medical reporters in a mixed method study on their relationship with public relations practitioners through the construct of trust. The findings indicate that most medical reporters, although acknowledging the increasing influence of public relations on medical news production, generally do not trust public relations sources, especially those in the corporate sector. However, if ongoing PR sources are considered reliable and trustworthy, then the relationship can become one of trust and interdependence.Patrizia FurlanAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAustraliaHealth journalismHealth reportingMedical newsPublic relationsTrustCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 18, Iss 2 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Australia
Health journalism
Health reporting
Medical news
Public relations
Trust
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle Australia
Health journalism
Health reporting
Medical news
Public relations
Trust
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Patrizia Furlan
Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
description Research on the effects of medical news stories on the public has demonstrated that consumers make decisions about personal health care options and choices sometimes exclusively based on stories published by the media. Given the news media’s ability to set the agenda for what the lay public, government policymakers and even health professionals consider topical and important, medical news reporting has an added sense of responsibility to be timely, reliable and accurate. Public relations practitioners involved in medical promotion can be the behind-the-scenes providers of information and access to important sources in medical news production. This relationship has been an emerging area of research focus in the US but has received scant attention in Australia. Just as in other areas of reporting, the relational dynamics between reporter and PR source are often conflicting and contradictory. This article will explore the views of 25 Australian medical reporters in a mixed method study on their relationship with public relations practitioners through the construct of trust. The findings indicate that most medical reporters, although acknowledging the increasing influence of public relations on medical news production, generally do not trust public relations sources, especially those in the corporate sector. However, if ongoing PR sources are considered reliable and trustworthy, then the relationship can become one of trust and interdependence.
format article
author Patrizia Furlan
author_facet Patrizia Furlan
author_sort Patrizia Furlan
title Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
title_short Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
title_full Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
title_fullStr Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
title_full_unstemmed Who can you trust? Medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
title_sort who can you trust? medical news, the public and what reporters think about public relations sources
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/aefe70e529d142ed92b42d795a2e1b0c
work_keys_str_mv AT patriziafurlan whocanyoutrustmedicalnewsthepublicandwhatreportersthinkaboutpublicrelationssources
_version_ 1718397429541240832