Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?

Background: Even if both phonological and semantic cues can facilitate word retrieval in aphasia, it remains unclear if their respective effectiveness varies according to the underlying anomic profile.Aim: The aim of the present facilitation study is to compare the effect of phonological and semanti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Grégoire Python, Pauline Pellet Cheneval, Caroline Bonnans, Marina Laganaro
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	anomia picture naming semantic priming phonological cueing facilitation Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/af00d509caf240ebbc2edc9c447e316c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:af00d509caf240ebbc2edc9c447e316c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:af00d509caf240ebbc2edc9c447e316c2021-12-01T07:50:19ZFacilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?1662-516110.3389/fnhum.2021.747391https://doaj.org/article/af00d509caf240ebbc2edc9c447e316c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.747391/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1662-5161Background: Even if both phonological and semantic cues can facilitate word retrieval in aphasia, it remains unclear if their respective effectiveness varies according to the underlying anomic profile.Aim: The aim of the present facilitation study is to compare the effect of phonological and semantic cues on picture naming accuracy and speed in different types of anomia.Methods: In the present within-subject design study, 15 aphasic persons following brain damage underwent picture naming paradigms with semantic cues (categorically- or associatively related) and phonological cues (initial phoneme presented auditorily, visually or both).Results: At the group level, semantic cueing was as effective as phonological cueing to significantly speed up picture naming. However, while phonological cues were effective regardless of the anomic profile, semantic cueing effects varied depending on the type of anomia. Participants with mixed anomia showed facilitation after both semantic categorical and associative cues, but individuals with lexical-phonological anomia only after categorical cues. Crucially, semantic cues were ineffective for participants with lexical-semantic anomia. These disparities were confirmed by categorical semantic facilitation decreasing when semantic/omission errors prevailed in the anomic profile, but increasing alongside phonological errors.Conclusion: The effectiveness of phonological vs semantic cues seems related to the underlying anomic profile: phonological cues benefit any type of anomia, but semantic cues only lexical-phonological or mixed anomia.Grégoire PythonGrégoire PythonPauline Pellet ChenevalCaroline BonnansMarina LaganaroFrontiers Media S.A.articleanomiapicture namingsemantic primingphonological cueingfacilitationNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol 15 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	anomia picture naming semantic priming phonological cueing facilitation Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571
spellingShingle	anomia picture naming semantic priming phonological cueing facilitation Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Grégoire Python Grégoire Python Pauline Pellet Cheneval Caroline Bonnans Marina Laganaro Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
description	Background: Even if both phonological and semantic cues can facilitate word retrieval in aphasia, it remains unclear if their respective effectiveness varies according to the underlying anomic profile.Aim: The aim of the present facilitation study is to compare the effect of phonological and semantic cues on picture naming accuracy and speed in different types of anomia.Methods: In the present within-subject design study, 15 aphasic persons following brain damage underwent picture naming paradigms with semantic cues (categorically- or associatively related) and phonological cues (initial phoneme presented auditorily, visually or both).Results: At the group level, semantic cueing was as effective as phonological cueing to significantly speed up picture naming. However, while phonological cues were effective regardless of the anomic profile, semantic cueing effects varied depending on the type of anomia. Participants with mixed anomia showed facilitation after both semantic categorical and associative cues, but individuals with lexical-phonological anomia only after categorical cues. Crucially, semantic cues were ineffective for participants with lexical-semantic anomia. These disparities were confirmed by categorical semantic facilitation decreasing when semantic/omission errors prevailed in the anomic profile, but increasing alongside phonological errors.Conclusion: The effectiveness of phonological vs semantic cues seems related to the underlying anomic profile: phonological cues benefit any type of anomia, but semantic cues only lexical-phonological or mixed anomia.
format	article
author	Grégoire Python Grégoire Python Pauline Pellet Cheneval Caroline Bonnans Marina Laganaro
author_facet	Grégoire Python Grégoire Python Pauline Pellet Cheneval Caroline Bonnans Marina Laganaro
author_sort	Grégoire Python
title	Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
title_short	Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
title_full	Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
title_fullStr	Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
title_full_unstemmed	Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?
title_sort	facilitating word retrieval in aphasia: which type of cues for which aphasic speakers?
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/af00d509caf240ebbc2edc9c447e316c
work_keys_str_mv	AT gregoirepython facilitatingwordretrievalinaphasiawhichtypeofcuesforwhichaphasicspeakers AT gregoirepython facilitatingwordretrievalinaphasiawhichtypeofcuesforwhichaphasicspeakers AT paulinepelletcheneval facilitatingwordretrievalinaphasiawhichtypeofcuesforwhichaphasicspeakers AT carolinebonnans facilitatingwordretrievalinaphasiawhichtypeofcuesforwhichaphasicspeakers AT marinalaganaro facilitatingwordretrievalinaphasiawhichtypeofcuesforwhichaphasicspeakers
_version_	1718405434465845248

Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?

Ejemplares similares