Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience

Despite the high interest of political scientists in the “soft power” concept, little attention is paid to its institutional dimension. The paper attempts to fill this gap by systematizing knowledge in this area, defining conceptual questions and suggesting analytical tools. The paper is based on th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	A. P. Vorochkov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2021
Materias:	“soft power” political institutions institutional model institutionalization public diplomacy russian politics Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/af06c88b0a8d4bf5ba93876c14210c64
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:af06c88b0a8d4bf5ba93876c14210c64
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:af06c88b0a8d4bf5ba93876c14210c642021-11-12T10:46:14ZInstitutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience1726-11391816-859010.22394/1726-1139-2021-7-80-96https://doaj.org/article/af06c88b0a8d4bf5ba93876c14210c642021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1412https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590Despite the high interest of political scientists in the “soft power” concept, little attention is paid to its institutional dimension. The paper attempts to fill this gap by systematizing knowledge in this area, defining conceptual questions and suggesting analytical tools. The paper is based on three established approaches to define the political institutions: regulatory, organizational, and practical (activity-based) ones. In its turn, an understanding of the “soft power” concept is reflected by the approach of J. Nye. On this basis, the author clarifies the content of the institutional dimension in the “soft power” policy context and suggests an institutional model of a modern state’s “soft power” policy as an analytical tool. The potential use of the suggested model is considered by the example of Russia. This paper calls for a discussion about the institutional manifestations of the “soft power” policy, clarification of the subject area, and development of tools to study this phenomenon.A. P. VorochkovNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration article“soft power”political institutionsinstitutional modelinstitutionalizationpublic diplomacyrussian politicsPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 7, Pp 80-97 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	“soft power” political institutions institutional model institutionalization public diplomacy russian politics Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112
spellingShingle	“soft power” political institutions institutional model institutionalization public diplomacy russian politics Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 A. P. Vorochkov Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
description	Despite the high interest of political scientists in the “soft power” concept, little attention is paid to its institutional dimension. The paper attempts to fill this gap by systematizing knowledge in this area, defining conceptual questions and suggesting analytical tools. The paper is based on three established approaches to define the political institutions: regulatory, organizational, and practical (activity-based) ones. In its turn, an understanding of the “soft power” concept is reflected by the approach of J. Nye. On this basis, the author clarifies the content of the institutional dimension in the “soft power” policy context and suggests an institutional model of a modern state’s “soft power” policy as an analytical tool. The potential use of the suggested model is considered by the example of Russia. This paper calls for a discussion about the institutional manifestations of the “soft power” policy, clarification of the subject area, and development of tools to study this phenomenon.
format	article
author	A. P. Vorochkov
author_facet	A. P. Vorochkov
author_sort	A. P. Vorochkov
title	Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
title_short	Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
title_full	Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
title_fullStr	Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
title_full_unstemmed	Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience
title_sort	institutional dimension of the “soft power” policy: analytical method and russian experience
publisher	North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/af06c88b0a8d4bf5ba93876c14210c64
work_keys_str_mv	AT apvorochkov institutionaldimensionofthesoftpowerpolicyanalyticalmethodandrussianexperience
_version_	1718430699727355904

Institutional Dimension of the “Soft Power” Policy: Analytical Method and Russian Experience

Ejemplares similares