Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s

The article examines the trilogy by Dina Rubina “People of the Air” (2008—2010) and “Russian Canary” (2014). The relevance of the study is due, firstly, to the low degree of study of the trilogy “Russian Canary” (the onomastic space of the work is analyzed and the features of the book are determined...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	E. V. Merkel, E. S. Tulusheva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2020
Materias:	world modeling taxonomy the character plot cycle trilogy artistic method Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/af5fb9bd5adb4669b08b0c0adfd94295
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:af5fb9bd5adb4669b08b0c0adfd94295
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:af5fb9bd5adb4669b08b0c0adfd942952021-12-02T07:58:13ZCharacter Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-185-195https://doaj.org/article/af5fb9bd5adb4669b08b0c0adfd942952020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2218https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article examines the trilogy by Dina Rubina “People of the Air” (2008—2010) and “Russian Canary” (2014). The relevance of the study is due, firstly, to the low degree of study of the trilogy “Russian Canary” (the onomastic space of the work is analyzed and the features of the book are determined in the context of a family novel of the 20th century); secondly, the need to differentiate the author’s artistic methodology, which is different in the studied macro-texts. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the authors, comparing the two trilogies by Dina Rubina, come to the conclusion that the author uses various semiotic strategies for constructing texts, thus revealing the homology of storylines, methods of constructing character series and general principles of world modeling of trilogies. The results of a comparative analysis are presented, which allow us to see the patterns of the artistic search of a modern author and his stylistic innovations. It is proved that with the parallelism of character series of two epic cycles, the author in the first case resorts to the artistic method of magical realism (“People of the Air”), and in the second case uses realistic principles of writing (“Russian Canary”).E. V. MerkelE. S. TulushevaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleworld modelingtaxonomythe characterplotcycletrilogyartistic methodSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 12, Pp 185-195 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	world modeling taxonomy the character plot cycle trilogy artistic method Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	world modeling taxonomy the character plot cycle trilogy artistic method Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 E. V. Merkel E. S. Tulusheva Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
description	The article examines the trilogy by Dina Rubina “People of the Air” (2008—2010) and “Russian Canary” (2014). The relevance of the study is due, firstly, to the low degree of study of the trilogy “Russian Canary” (the onomastic space of the work is analyzed and the features of the book are determined in the context of a family novel of the 20th century); secondly, the need to differentiate the author’s artistic methodology, which is different in the studied macro-texts. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the authors, comparing the two trilogies by Dina Rubina, come to the conclusion that the author uses various semiotic strategies for constructing texts, thus revealing the homology of storylines, methods of constructing character series and general principles of world modeling of trilogies. The results of a comparative analysis are presented, which allow us to see the patterns of the artistic search of a modern author and his stylistic innovations. It is proved that with the parallelism of character series of two epic cycles, the author in the first case resorts to the artistic method of magical realism (“People of the Air”), and in the second case uses realistic principles of writing (“Russian Canary”).
format	article
author	E. V. Merkel E. S. Tulusheva
author_facet	E. V. Merkel E. S. Tulusheva
author_sort	E. V. Merkel
title	Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
title_short	Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
title_full	Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
title_fullStr	Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
title_full_unstemmed	Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
title_sort	character taxonomy in dina rubina’s trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/af5fb9bd5adb4669b08b0c0adfd94295
work_keys_str_mv	AT evmerkel charactertaxonomyindinarubinastrilogiesofthe2000s2010s AT estulusheva charactertaxonomyindinarubinastrilogiesofthe2000s2010s
_version_	1718398809517588480

Character Taxonomy in Dina Rubina’s Trilogies of the 2000s— 2010s

Ejemplares similares