Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.

Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doris Preininger, Markus Boeckle, Marc Sztatecsny, Walter Hödl
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/af8ffdc3b5e64e6e86ba5b713a05a63d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:af8ffdc3b5e64e6e86ba5b713a05a63d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:af8ffdc3b5e64e6e86ba5b713a05a63d2021-11-18T07:59:38ZDivergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0055367https://doaj.org/article/af8ffdc3b5e64e6e86ba5b713a05a63d2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23383168/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola.Doris PreiningerMarkus BoeckleMarc SztatecsnyWalter HödlPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 1, p e55367 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Doris Preininger
Markus Boeckle
Marc Sztatecsny
Walter Hödl
Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
description Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola.
format article
author Doris Preininger
Markus Boeckle
Marc Sztatecsny
Walter Hödl
author_facet Doris Preininger
Markus Boeckle
Marc Sztatecsny
Walter Hödl
author_sort Doris Preininger
title Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
title_short Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
title_full Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
title_fullStr Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
title_full_unstemmed Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
title_sort divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/af8ffdc3b5e64e6e86ba5b713a05a63d
work_keys_str_mv AT dorispreininger divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT markusboeckle divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT marcsztatecsny divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
AT walterhodl divergentreceiverresponsestocomponentsofmultimodalsignalsintwofootflaggingfrogspecies
_version_ 1718422689254735872