The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior

Abstract Environmental degradation continues to be one of the greatest threats to human well-being, posing a disproportionate burden on communities of color. Environmental action, however, fails to reflect this urgency, leaving social-behavioral research at the frontier of environmental conservation...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kinga Makovi, Hannah Kasak-Gliboff
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b031decf9b16421ba2e3102757a294ce
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b031decf9b16421ba2e3102757a294ce
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b031decf9b16421ba2e3102757a294ce2021-11-14T12:20:57ZThe effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior10.1038/s41598-021-00329-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b031decf9b16421ba2e3102757a294ce2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00329-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Environmental degradation continues to be one of the greatest threats to human well-being, posing a disproportionate burden on communities of color. Environmental action, however, fails to reflect this urgency, leaving social-behavioral research at the frontier of environmental conservation, as well as environmental justice. Broad societal consensus for environmental action is particularly sparse among conservatives. The lack of even small personal sacrifices in favor of the environment could be attributed to the relatively low salience of environmental threats to white Americans and the partisan nature of environmentalism in America. We evaluate if (1) environmental action is causally related to the ideological value framing of an environmental issue; and (2) if the perceived race of impacted communities influences environmental action as a function of racial resentment. With this large-scale, original survey experiment examining the case of air-pollution, we find weak support for the first, but we do not find evidence for the second. We advance our understanding of environmental justice advocacy and environmental inaction in the United States. Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 10 June 2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14769558 .Kinga MakoviHannah Kasak-GliboffNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kinga Makovi Hannah Kasak-Gliboff The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
description	Abstract Environmental degradation continues to be one of the greatest threats to human well-being, posing a disproportionate burden on communities of color. Environmental action, however, fails to reflect this urgency, leaving social-behavioral research at the frontier of environmental conservation, as well as environmental justice. Broad societal consensus for environmental action is particularly sparse among conservatives. The lack of even small personal sacrifices in favor of the environment could be attributed to the relatively low salience of environmental threats to white Americans and the partisan nature of environmentalism in America. We evaluate if (1) environmental action is causally related to the ideological value framing of an environmental issue; and (2) if the perceived race of impacted communities influences environmental action as a function of racial resentment. With this large-scale, original survey experiment examining the case of air-pollution, we find weak support for the first, but we do not find evidence for the second. We advance our understanding of environmental justice advocacy and environmental inaction in the United States. Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 10 June 2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14769558 .
format	article
author	Kinga Makovi Hannah Kasak-Gliboff
author_facet	Kinga Makovi Hannah Kasak-Gliboff
author_sort	Kinga Makovi
title	The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
title_short	The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
title_full	The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
title_fullStr	The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
title_full_unstemmed	The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
title_sort	effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b031decf9b16421ba2e3102757a294ce
work_keys_str_mv	AT kingamakovi theeffectsofideologicalvalueframingandsymbolicracismonproenvironmentalbehavior AT hannahkasakgliboff theeffectsofideologicalvalueframingandsymbolicracismonproenvironmentalbehavior AT kingamakovi effectsofideologicalvalueframingandsymbolicracismonproenvironmentalbehavior AT hannahkasakgliboff effectsofideologicalvalueframingandsymbolicracismonproenvironmentalbehavior
_version_	1718429250909896704

The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior

Ejemplares similares