Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding

Purposes: The study's purpose was to develop a prognostic scale for identifying patients at high or low risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding (RB). Methods: To identify the factors influencing RB, a retrospective single-centre study of 240 patients with ulcerative bleeding was carried out. The first...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maksim V. Valeev, Shamil V. Timerbulatov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Light House Polyclinic Mangalore 2021
Materias:	ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding rebleeding risk assessment prognostic scale Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b0768edb9e3c45fa85986fdb5a9593da
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b0768edb9e3c45fa85986fdb5a9593da
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b0768edb9e3c45fa85986fdb5a9593da2021-11-12T08:34:24ZGastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding0972-5997https://doaj.org/article/b0768edb9e3c45fa85986fdb5a9593da2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ojhas.org/issue79/2021-3-11.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/0972-5997Purposes: The study's purpose was to develop a prognostic scale for identifying patients at high or low risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding (RB). Methods: To identify the factors influencing RB, a retrospective single-centre study of 240 patients with ulcerative bleeding was carried out. The first group included 52 patients with RB, the second group included 188 patients who did not have RB. The authors identified criteria associated with the development of recurrent ulcerative bleeding. The identified criteria were included in the recurrent bleeding prognostic scale. To assess the quality of the prognosis of the developed predictive system and compare it to analogues, a single-centre retrospective study was carried out, which included 100 patients with ulcerative bleeding. The efficiency of the elaborated predictive system was compared to the mGBS and RS scales using the ROC-analysis approach. Results: The following criteria influenced the development of rebleeding: shock index, the number of erythrocytes, urea and total blood protein, ulcer localization along the lesser curvature of the stomach and the posterior wall of the duodenum, Type 2A, 2C, and 3 hemostasis according to Forrest. The developed scale demonstrated a higher quality of the RB prognosis in comparison with the mGBS and RS (AUROC - 0.877, 0.784, and 0.731, respectively). The sensitivity was 90.5%, the specificity was 78.5%. Conclusion: The developed scale can be used to identify patients with a low or high risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding. With further study of the effectiveness of the scale, it is possible to shift the threshold value for changing the indicators of specificity and sensitivity.Maksim V. ValeevShamil V. TimerbulatovLight House Polyclinic Mangalore articleulcerative gastroduodenal bleedingrebleedingrisk assessmentprognostic scaleMedicineRENOnline Journal of Health & Allied Sciences, Vol 20, Iss 3 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding rebleeding risk assessment prognostic scale Medicine R
spellingShingle	ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding rebleeding risk assessment prognostic scale Medicine R Maksim V. Valeev Shamil V. Timerbulatov Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
description	Purposes: The study's purpose was to develop a prognostic scale for identifying patients at high or low risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding (RB). Methods: To identify the factors influencing RB, a retrospective single-centre study of 240 patients with ulcerative bleeding was carried out. The first group included 52 patients with RB, the second group included 188 patients who did not have RB. The authors identified criteria associated with the development of recurrent ulcerative bleeding. The identified criteria were included in the recurrent bleeding prognostic scale. To assess the quality of the prognosis of the developed predictive system and compare it to analogues, a single-centre retrospective study was carried out, which included 100 patients with ulcerative bleeding. The efficiency of the elaborated predictive system was compared to the mGBS and RS scales using the ROC-analysis approach. Results: The following criteria influenced the development of rebleeding: shock index, the number of erythrocytes, urea and total blood protein, ulcer localization along the lesser curvature of the stomach and the posterior wall of the duodenum, Type 2A, 2C, and 3 hemostasis according to Forrest. The developed scale demonstrated a higher quality of the RB prognosis in comparison with the mGBS and RS (AUROC - 0.877, 0.784, and 0.731, respectively). The sensitivity was 90.5%, the specificity was 78.5%. Conclusion: The developed scale can be used to identify patients with a low or high risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding. With further study of the effectiveness of the scale, it is possible to shift the threshold value for changing the indicators of specificity and sensitivity.
format	article
author	Maksim V. Valeev Shamil V. Timerbulatov
author_facet	Maksim V. Valeev Shamil V. Timerbulatov
author_sort	Maksim V. Valeev
title	Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
title_short	Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
title_full	Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
title_fullStr	Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
title_full_unstemmed	Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding
title_sort	gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding: the prognosis of rebleeding
publisher	Light House Polyclinic Mangalore
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b0768edb9e3c45fa85986fdb5a9593da
work_keys_str_mv	AT maksimvvaleev gastroduodenalulcerbleedingtheprognosisofrebleeding AT shamilvtimerbulatov gastroduodenalulcerbleedingtheprognosisofrebleeding
_version_	1718431072980566016

Gastroduodenal Ulcer Bleeding: The Prognosis of Rebleeding

Ejemplares similares