Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study

Objective To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4.Methods and Analysis From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmological...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedro Barros, Sandra Guimaraes, Andreia Soares, Cristina Freitas, Ricardo Dourado Leite, Patrício Soares Costa, Eduardo D Silva
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b09bec8f2c924373af61ad416cdc882d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b09bec8f2c924373af61ad416cdc882d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b09bec8f2c924373af61ad416cdc882d2021-11-08T06:30:05ZAmblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study10.1136/bmjophth-2020-0005992397-3269https://doaj.org/article/b09bec8f2c924373af61ad416cdc882d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000599.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2397-3269Objective To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4.Methods and Analysis From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmological evaluation. Amblyopia was diagnosed, treated and followed. Amblyopia prevalence, treatment effectiveness, absolute risk reduction (ARR), number needed to screen (NNS) and relative risk reduction (RRR) were estimated.Results Past/present history of amblyopia was higher than 3.1%–4.2%, depending on amblyopia definition normatives. Screening at age 3–4, had estimated ARR=2.09% (95% CI 1.50% to 2.68%) with a reduced risk of amblyopia in adulthood of 87% (RRR). NNS was 47.8 (95% CI 37.3 to 66.7). Treatment effectiveness of new diagnosis was 88% (83% if we include children already followed). 91% of new amblyopia diagnoses were refractive (of which 100% surpassed amblyopia Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study criteria after treatment), while most strabismic amblyopias were already treated or undertreatment. Only 30% of children with refractive amblyopia risk factors that were not followed by an ophthalmologist, ended up having amblyopia at age 3–4. Eye patch was needed equally in new-diagnosis versus treated-earlier refractive amblyopia.Conclusions Screening amblyopia in a whole-population setting at age 3–4 is highly effective. For each 48 children screened at age 3–4, one amblyopia is estimated to be prevented in the future (NNS). Screening earlier may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatments: Treating all new diagnosis before age 3–4 would have a maximal difference in ARR of 0.3%, with the possible burden of as much as 70% children being unnecessary treated before age 3–4.Involving primary care, with policies for timely referral of suspicious/high-risk preverbal children, plus whole screening at age 3–4 seems a rational/effective way of controlling amblyopia.Pedro BarrosSandra GuimaraesAndreia SoaresCristina FreitasRicardo Dourado LeitePatrício Soares CostaEduardo D SilvaBMJ Publishing GrouparticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENBMJ Open Ophthalmology, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Pedro Barros
Sandra Guimaraes
Andreia Soares
Cristina Freitas
Ricardo Dourado Leite
Patrício Soares Costa
Eduardo D Silva
Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
description Objective To study the effectiveness of amblyopia screening at ages 3–4.Methods and Analysis From a population with no previous screening, a cohort of 2300 children with 3–4 years old attending school (91% of children this age attend school in Portugal), were submitted to a complete ophthalmological evaluation. Amblyopia was diagnosed, treated and followed. Amblyopia prevalence, treatment effectiveness, absolute risk reduction (ARR), number needed to screen (NNS) and relative risk reduction (RRR) were estimated.Results Past/present history of amblyopia was higher than 3.1%–4.2%, depending on amblyopia definition normatives. Screening at age 3–4, had estimated ARR=2.09% (95% CI 1.50% to 2.68%) with a reduced risk of amblyopia in adulthood of 87% (RRR). NNS was 47.8 (95% CI 37.3 to 66.7). Treatment effectiveness of new diagnosis was 88% (83% if we include children already followed). 91% of new amblyopia diagnoses were refractive (of which 100% surpassed amblyopia Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study criteria after treatment), while most strabismic amblyopias were already treated or undertreatment. Only 30% of children with refractive amblyopia risk factors that were not followed by an ophthalmologist, ended up having amblyopia at age 3–4. Eye patch was needed equally in new-diagnosis versus treated-earlier refractive amblyopia.Conclusions Screening amblyopia in a whole-population setting at age 3–4 is highly effective. For each 48 children screened at age 3–4, one amblyopia is estimated to be prevented in the future (NNS). Screening earlier may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatments: Treating all new diagnosis before age 3–4 would have a maximal difference in ARR of 0.3%, with the possible burden of as much as 70% children being unnecessary treated before age 3–4.Involving primary care, with policies for timely referral of suspicious/high-risk preverbal children, plus whole screening at age 3–4 seems a rational/effective way of controlling amblyopia.
format article
author Pedro Barros
Sandra Guimaraes
Andreia Soares
Cristina Freitas
Ricardo Dourado Leite
Patrício Soares Costa
Eduardo D Silva
author_facet Pedro Barros
Sandra Guimaraes
Andreia Soares
Cristina Freitas
Ricardo Dourado Leite
Patrício Soares Costa
Eduardo D Silva
author_sort Pedro Barros
title Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
title_short Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
title_full Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
title_fullStr Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
title_sort amblyopia screening effectiveness at 3–4 years old: a cohort study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b09bec8f2c924373af61ad416cdc882d
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrobarros amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT sandraguimaraes amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT andreiasoares amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT cristinafreitas amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT ricardodouradoleite amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT patriciosoarescosta amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
AT eduardodsilva amblyopiascreeningeffectivenessat34yearsoldacohortstudy
_version_ 1718442938411778048