Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles of water have experienced huge growth in demand and sales in South Africa. This expansion in use creates challenges as well as opportunities for managing the life cycle impact. The properties that make PET desirable for fluid-containing bottles have also mad...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kunle I. Olatayo, Paul T. Mativenga, Annlizé L. Marnewick
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Academy of Science of South Africa 2021
Materias:	plastic life cycle assessment PET single-use bottle reusable bottle Science Q Science (General) Q1-390 Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b0f1221e4634427896aa2994f89506fd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b0f1221e4634427896aa2994f89506fd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b0f1221e4634427896aa2994f89506fd2021-12-02T06:15:04ZLife cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg10.17159/sajs.2021/89081996-7489https://doaj.org/article/b0f1221e4634427896aa2994f89506fd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://sajs.co.za/article/view/8908https://doaj.org/toc/1996-7489 Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles of water have experienced huge growth in demand and sales in South Africa. This expansion in use creates challenges as well as opportunities for managing the life cycle impact. The properties that make PET desirable for fluid-containing bottles have also made it highly resistant to environmental biodegradation. Reusable plastic bottles are now marketed as a solution to reduce the impact of single-use plastic bottles. We assessed the life cycle impact of single-use PET bottles and an alternative, reusable PET bottle based on consumption patterns in South Africa and the material flow and supply chain in the urban environment. This robust consideration of local conditions is important in evaluating the life cycle impact. In an examination of 13 impact categories, the reusable PET bottle had lower impact than the single-use bottle in all the impact categories examined. The mass of PET bottle material required to deliver the water needs at any given time is a dominant factor on the environmental burden. Extending the life of reusable bottles and designing lighter weight bottles would reduce their life cycle impact. Information obtained in evaluating alternatives to plastic water bottles can be valuable for providing a foundation assessment for policymakers and plastic bottle manufacturers to make informed choices and to focus on improvements in life cycle impact. Significance: • The significant impact of the production phase in the life cycle of both single-use and reusable PET bottles confirms the need to design a much more lightweight bottle to reduce the mass of materials used in production. • Another key consideration was the long transportation distance covered during the production phase, and the negative impact of current vehicular emissions. Municipalities and waste collectors should consider the use of low-carbon transport. • This study highlights the value of extending the life of plastic bottles, as well as recycling for material recovery, remanufacturing and repurposing these bottles within the City. • The use of fewer, larger single-use bottles compared with a greater number of smaller single-use bottles is discussed. Kunle I. OlatayoPaul T. MativengaAnnlizé L. MarnewickAcademy of Science of South Africaarticleplasticlife cycle assessmentPETsingle-use bottlereusable bottleScienceQScience (General)Q1-390Social SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENSouth African Journal of Science, Vol 117, Iss 11/12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	plastic life cycle assessment PET single-use bottle reusable bottle Science Q Science (General) Q1-390 Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	plastic life cycle assessment PET single-use bottle reusable bottle Science Q Science (General) Q1-390 Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Kunle I. Olatayo Paul T. Mativenga Annlizé L. Marnewick Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
description	Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles of water have experienced huge growth in demand and sales in South Africa. This expansion in use creates challenges as well as opportunities for managing the life cycle impact. The properties that make PET desirable for fluid-containing bottles have also made it highly resistant to environmental biodegradation. Reusable plastic bottles are now marketed as a solution to reduce the impact of single-use plastic bottles. We assessed the life cycle impact of single-use PET bottles and an alternative, reusable PET bottle based on consumption patterns in South Africa and the material flow and supply chain in the urban environment. This robust consideration of local conditions is important in evaluating the life cycle impact. In an examination of 13 impact categories, the reusable PET bottle had lower impact than the single-use bottle in all the impact categories examined. The mass of PET bottle material required to deliver the water needs at any given time is a dominant factor on the environmental burden. Extending the life of reusable bottles and designing lighter weight bottles would reduce their life cycle impact. Information obtained in evaluating alternatives to plastic water bottles can be valuable for providing a foundation assessment for policymakers and plastic bottle manufacturers to make informed choices and to focus on improvements in life cycle impact. Significance: • The significant impact of the production phase in the life cycle of both single-use and reusable PET bottles confirms the need to design a much more lightweight bottle to reduce the mass of materials used in production. • Another key consideration was the long transportation distance covered during the production phase, and the negative impact of current vehicular emissions. Municipalities and waste collectors should consider the use of low-carbon transport. • This study highlights the value of extending the life of plastic bottles, as well as recycling for material recovery, remanufacturing and repurposing these bottles within the City. • The use of fewer, larger single-use bottles compared with a greater number of smaller single-use bottles is discussed.
format	article
author	Kunle I. Olatayo Paul T. Mativenga Annlizé L. Marnewick
author_facet	Kunle I. Olatayo Paul T. Mativenga Annlizé L. Marnewick
author_sort	Kunle I. Olatayo
title	Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
title_short	Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
title_full	Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
title_fullStr	Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
title_full_unstemmed	Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
title_sort	life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of johannesburg
publisher	Academy of Science of South Africa
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b0f1221e4634427896aa2994f89506fd
work_keys_str_mv	AT kunleiolatayo lifecycleassessmentofsingleuseandreusableplasticbottlesinthecityofjohannesburg AT paultmativenga lifecycleassessmentofsingleuseandreusableplasticbottlesinthecityofjohannesburg AT annlizelmarnewick lifecycleassessmentofsingleuseandreusableplasticbottlesinthecityofjohannesburg
_version_	1718400010071048192

Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg

Ejemplares similares