Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience

Abstract Background A prospective study was conducted on 65 cases with distal hypospadias operated using the urethral mobilization technique between July 2017 and December 2019. Patients with proximal hypospadias and those with distal hypospadias, but with a hypoplastic urethra, were excluded from t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Obay Abdul Aziz Edan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b14c9f12622e4220b3a3f620701754a2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b14c9f12622e4220b3a3f620701754a2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b14c9f12622e4220b3a3f620701754a22021-11-14T12:24:43ZUrethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience10.1186/s43159-021-00125-42090-5394https://doaj.org/article/b14c9f12622e4220b3a3f620701754a22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43159-021-00125-4https://doaj.org/toc/2090-5394Abstract Background A prospective study was conducted on 65 cases with distal hypospadias operated using the urethral mobilization technique between July 2017 and December 2019. Patients with proximal hypospadias and those with distal hypospadias, but with a hypoplastic urethra, were excluded from the study. In this technique, the urethral tube was mobilized proximally in a ratio of 3–4:1 (the ratio of mobilized urethral length to the initial distance between the native meatus and the tip of the glans) then positioned distally after creating wide glans wings. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the urethral mobilization technique in distal hypospadias in our center. Results The age of patients was ranged 9 months to 7 years old (mean 37.5 months); 17 (26%) cases were already circumcised. During the postoperative follow-up, 62 (95.4%) patients had a good caliber neomeatus with a good and straight urinary stream; the remaining 3 (4.6%) cases developed meatal stenosis which responded well to urethral dilatation. One (1.5%) patient had a minor retraction of neomeatus but remained within the glans and not requiring further intervention. Four (6%) cases developed minor hematoma which was resolved on conservative measures. Six (9.2%) patients developed minor wound infection which was treated with daily dressing and antibiotic coverage. Conclusion The urethral mobilization technique is a good choice for repairing distal hypospadias especially for boys who are previously circumcised as the preputial flap is not required in this technique. It provides good cosmetic and functional results, with a fewer complication rate.Obay Abdul Aziz EdanSpringerOpenarticleUrethral mobilizationDistalHypospadiasPediatricsRJ1-570SurgeryRD1-811ENAnnals of Pediatric Surgery, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Urethral mobilization
Distal
Hypospadias
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Urethral mobilization
Distal
Hypospadias
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
Surgery
RD1-811
Obay Abdul Aziz Edan
Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
description Abstract Background A prospective study was conducted on 65 cases with distal hypospadias operated using the urethral mobilization technique between July 2017 and December 2019. Patients with proximal hypospadias and those with distal hypospadias, but with a hypoplastic urethra, were excluded from the study. In this technique, the urethral tube was mobilized proximally in a ratio of 3–4:1 (the ratio of mobilized urethral length to the initial distance between the native meatus and the tip of the glans) then positioned distally after creating wide glans wings. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the urethral mobilization technique in distal hypospadias in our center. Results The age of patients was ranged 9 months to 7 years old (mean 37.5 months); 17 (26%) cases were already circumcised. During the postoperative follow-up, 62 (95.4%) patients had a good caliber neomeatus with a good and straight urinary stream; the remaining 3 (4.6%) cases developed meatal stenosis which responded well to urethral dilatation. One (1.5%) patient had a minor retraction of neomeatus but remained within the glans and not requiring further intervention. Four (6%) cases developed minor hematoma which was resolved on conservative measures. Six (9.2%) patients developed minor wound infection which was treated with daily dressing and antibiotic coverage. Conclusion The urethral mobilization technique is a good choice for repairing distal hypospadias especially for boys who are previously circumcised as the preputial flap is not required in this technique. It provides good cosmetic and functional results, with a fewer complication rate.
format article
author Obay Abdul Aziz Edan
author_facet Obay Abdul Aziz Edan
author_sort Obay Abdul Aziz Edan
title Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
title_short Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
title_full Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
title_fullStr Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
title_full_unstemmed Urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
title_sort urethral mobilization and advancement technique in distal types of hypospadias: short-term local experience
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b14c9f12622e4220b3a3f620701754a2
work_keys_str_mv AT obayabdulazizedan urethralmobilizationandadvancementtechniqueindistaltypesofhypospadiasshorttermlocalexperience
_version_ 1718429251280044032