Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse

Abstract Sow mortality attributable to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has increased in the U.S. swine industry and continues to worsen. Two main objectives of this study were, (1) to develop a perineal scoring system that can be correlated with POP risk, and (2) identify POP risk-associated biological...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoë E. Kiefer, Lucas R. Koester, Lucas Showman, Jamie M. Studer, Amanda L. Chipman, Aileen F. Keating, Stephan Schmitz-Esser, Jason W. Ross
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b17f384238d34d99ab4a7d5b5553a3b7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b17f384238d34d99ab4a7d5b5553a3b7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b17f384238d34d99ab4a7d5b5553a3b72021-12-02T11:39:39ZVaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse10.1038/s41598-021-85367-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b17f384238d34d99ab4a7d5b5553a3b72021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85367-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Sow mortality attributable to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has increased in the U.S. swine industry and continues to worsen. Two main objectives of this study were, (1) to develop a perineal scoring system that can be correlated with POP risk, and (2) identify POP risk-associated biological factors. To assess POP risk during late gestation, sows (n = 213) were scored using a newly developed perineal scoring (PS) system. Sows scored as PS1 (low), PS2 (moderate), or PS3 (high) based on POP risk. Subsequently, 1.5, 0.8, and 23.1% of sows scored PS1, PS2, or PS3, respectively, experienced POP. To identify biomarkers, serum and vaginal swabs were collected from late gestation sows differing in PS. Using GC–MS, 82 serum metabolite differences between PS1 and PS3 animals (P < 0.05) were identified. Vaginal swabs were utilized for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and differences in vaginal microbiomes between PS1 and PS3 animals were detected on a community level (P < 0.01) along with differences in abundances of 89 operational taxonomic units (P < 0.05). Collectively, these data demonstrate that sows with greater POP risk have differential serum metabolites and vaginal microflora. Additionally, an initial and novel characterization of the sow vaginal microbiome was determined.Zoë E. KieferLucas R. KoesterLucas ShowmanJamie M. StuderAmanda L. ChipmanAileen F. KeatingStephan Schmitz-EsserJason W. RossNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Zoë E. Kiefer
Lucas R. Koester
Lucas Showman
Jamie M. Studer
Amanda L. Chipman
Aileen F. Keating
Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Jason W. Ross
Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
description Abstract Sow mortality attributable to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has increased in the U.S. swine industry and continues to worsen. Two main objectives of this study were, (1) to develop a perineal scoring system that can be correlated with POP risk, and (2) identify POP risk-associated biological factors. To assess POP risk during late gestation, sows (n = 213) were scored using a newly developed perineal scoring (PS) system. Sows scored as PS1 (low), PS2 (moderate), or PS3 (high) based on POP risk. Subsequently, 1.5, 0.8, and 23.1% of sows scored PS1, PS2, or PS3, respectively, experienced POP. To identify biomarkers, serum and vaginal swabs were collected from late gestation sows differing in PS. Using GC–MS, 82 serum metabolite differences between PS1 and PS3 animals (P < 0.05) were identified. Vaginal swabs were utilized for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and differences in vaginal microbiomes between PS1 and PS3 animals were detected on a community level (P < 0.01) along with differences in abundances of 89 operational taxonomic units (P < 0.05). Collectively, these data demonstrate that sows with greater POP risk have differential serum metabolites and vaginal microflora. Additionally, an initial and novel characterization of the sow vaginal microbiome was determined.
format article
author Zoë E. Kiefer
Lucas R. Koester
Lucas Showman
Jamie M. Studer
Amanda L. Chipman
Aileen F. Keating
Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Jason W. Ross
author_facet Zoë E. Kiefer
Lucas R. Koester
Lucas Showman
Jamie M. Studer
Amanda L. Chipman
Aileen F. Keating
Stephan Schmitz-Esser
Jason W. Ross
author_sort Zoë E. Kiefer
title Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
title_short Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
title_full Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
title_fullStr Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
title_sort vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b17f384238d34d99ab4a7d5b5553a3b7
work_keys_str_mv AT zoeekiefer vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT lucasrkoester vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT lucasshowman vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT jamiemstuder vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT amandalchipman vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT aileenfkeating vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT stephanschmitzesser vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
AT jasonwross vaginalmicrobiomeandserummetabolitedifferencesinlategestationcommercialsowsatriskforpelvicorganprolapse
_version_ 1718395721027158016