Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model

Some studies suggest that religious people cope better with stress. For married couples, if partners perceive their relationship as sacred, supportive dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. In the current study, applying the actor–partner i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Anna M. Wendołowska, Dorota Czyżowska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) centrality of religiosity dyadic analyses coping with stress dyadic coping intimate relationships Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b1c2782e217a4d6ca85ad6ef71f10fad
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b1c2782e217a4d6ca85ad6ef71f10fad
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b1c2782e217a4d6ca85ad6ef71f10fad2021-11-25T18:53:03ZCentrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model10.3390/rel121109782077-1444https://doaj.org/article/b1c2782e217a4d6ca85ad6ef71f10fad2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/978https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444Some studies suggest that religious people cope better with stress. For married couples, if partners perceive their relationship as sacred, supportive dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. In the current study, applying the actor–partner interdependence model to 116 Polish couples (<i>n</i> = 232), aged between 21 and 64 (males: <i>M</i> = 37.8, <i>SD</i> = 11.8; females <i>M</i> = 37.1, <i>SD</i> = 12.0), we examined the link between centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping. Although general dyadic analyses indicate that centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping are unrelated concepts, at the subscales level, we could observe few significant relationships. The results show that Polish religious men rate their common dyadic coping low. Actor effects in women are moderated by the type of relationship (cohabitation and civil marriage vs. catholic marriage).Anna M. WendołowskaDorota CzyżowskaMDPI AGarticleactor–partner interdependence model (APIM)centrality of religiositydyadic analysescoping with stressdyadic copingintimate relationshipsReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 978, p 978 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) centrality of religiosity dyadic analyses coping with stress dyadic coping intimate relationships Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790
spellingShingle	actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) centrality of religiosity dyadic analyses coping with stress dyadic coping intimate relationships Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790 Anna M. Wendołowska Dorota Czyżowska Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
description	Some studies suggest that religious people cope better with stress. For married couples, if partners perceive their relationship as sacred, supportive dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. In the current study, applying the actor–partner interdependence model to 116 Polish couples (<i>n</i> = 232), aged between 21 and 64 (males: <i>M</i> = 37.8, <i>SD</i> = 11.8; females <i>M</i> = 37.1, <i>SD</i> = 12.0), we examined the link between centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping. Although general dyadic analyses indicate that centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping are unrelated concepts, at the subscales level, we could observe few significant relationships. The results show that Polish religious men rate their common dyadic coping low. Actor effects in women are moderated by the type of relationship (cohabitation and civil marriage vs. catholic marriage).
format	article
author	Anna M. Wendołowska Dorota Czyżowska
author_facet	Anna M. Wendołowska Dorota Czyżowska
author_sort	Anna M. Wendołowska
title	Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
title_short	Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
title_full	Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
title_fullStr	Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
title_full_unstemmed	Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model
title_sort	centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping in close romantic relationships: actor partner interdependence model
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b1c2782e217a4d6ca85ad6ef71f10fad
work_keys_str_mv	AT annamwendołowska centralityofreligiosityanddyadiccopingincloseromanticrelationshipsactorpartnerinterdependencemodel AT dorotaczyzowska centralityofreligiosityanddyadiccopingincloseromanticrelationshipsactorpartnerinterdependencemodel
_version_	1718410613095399424

Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model

Ejemplares similares