A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial

Abstract Despite growing effort to advance materials towards a low fibrotic progression, all implants elicit adverse tissue responses. Pre-clinical biomaterial assessment relies on animals testing, which can be complemented by in vitro tests to address the Russell and Burch’s 3R aspect of reducing a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maren Jannasch, Sabine Gaetzner, Tobias Weigel, Heike Walles, Tobias Schmitz, Jan Hansmann
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b1d66dde8054436fb98773093d489942
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b1d66dde8054436fb98773093d489942
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b1d66dde8054436fb98773093d4899422021-12-02T12:32:29ZA comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial10.1038/s41598-017-01584-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b1d66dde8054436fb98773093d4899422017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01584-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Despite growing effort to advance materials towards a low fibrotic progression, all implants elicit adverse tissue responses. Pre-clinical biomaterial assessment relies on animals testing, which can be complemented by in vitro tests to address the Russell and Burch’s 3R aspect of reducing animal burden. However, a poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo biomaterial assessments confirms a need for suitable in vitro biomaterial tests. The aim of the study was to identify a test setting, which is predictive and might be time- and cost-efficient. We demonstrated how sensitive in vitro biomaterial assessment based on human primary macrophages depends on test conditions. Moreover, possible clinical scenarios such as lipopolysaccharide contamination, contact to autologous blood plasma, and presence of IL-4 in an immune niche influence the outcome of a biomaterial ranking. Nevertheless, by using glass, titanium, polytetrafluorethylene, silicone, and polyethylene representing a specific material-induced fibrotic response and by comparison to literature data, we were able to identify a test condition that provides a high correlation to state-of-the-art in vivo studies. Most important, biomaterial ranking obtained under native plasma test conditions showed a high predictive accuracy compared to in vivo assessments, strengthening a biomimetic three-dimensional in vitro test platform.Maren JannaschSabine GaetznerTobias WeigelHeike WallesTobias SchmitzJan HansmannNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Maren Jannasch
Sabine Gaetzner
Tobias Weigel
Heike Walles
Tobias Schmitz
Jan Hansmann
A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
description Abstract Despite growing effort to advance materials towards a low fibrotic progression, all implants elicit adverse tissue responses. Pre-clinical biomaterial assessment relies on animals testing, which can be complemented by in vitro tests to address the Russell and Burch’s 3R aspect of reducing animal burden. However, a poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo biomaterial assessments confirms a need for suitable in vitro biomaterial tests. The aim of the study was to identify a test setting, which is predictive and might be time- and cost-efficient. We demonstrated how sensitive in vitro biomaterial assessment based on human primary macrophages depends on test conditions. Moreover, possible clinical scenarios such as lipopolysaccharide contamination, contact to autologous blood plasma, and presence of IL-4 in an immune niche influence the outcome of a biomaterial ranking. Nevertheless, by using glass, titanium, polytetrafluorethylene, silicone, and polyethylene representing a specific material-induced fibrotic response and by comparison to literature data, we were able to identify a test condition that provides a high correlation to state-of-the-art in vivo studies. Most important, biomaterial ranking obtained under native plasma test conditions showed a high predictive accuracy compared to in vivo assessments, strengthening a biomimetic three-dimensional in vitro test platform.
format article
author Maren Jannasch
Sabine Gaetzner
Tobias Weigel
Heike Walles
Tobias Schmitz
Jan Hansmann
author_facet Maren Jannasch
Sabine Gaetzner
Tobias Weigel
Heike Walles
Tobias Schmitz
Jan Hansmann
author_sort Maren Jannasch
title A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
title_short A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
title_full A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
title_fullStr A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
title_full_unstemmed A comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
title_sort comparative multi-parametric in vitro model identifies the power of test conditions to predict the fibrotic tendency of a biomaterial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/b1d66dde8054436fb98773093d489942
work_keys_str_mv AT marenjannasch acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT sabinegaetzner acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT tobiasweigel acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT heikewalles acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT tobiasschmitz acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT janhansmann acomparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT marenjannasch comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT sabinegaetzner comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT tobiasweigel comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT heikewalles comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT tobiasschmitz comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
AT janhansmann comparativemultiparametricinvitromodelidentifiesthepoweroftestconditionstopredictthefibrotictendencyofabiomaterial
_version_ 1718394056084553728