Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks

ABSTRACT: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: H. Bai, B. Yang, Z. Dong, X. Li, Q. Song, Y. Jiang, G. Chang, G. Chen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b226773fed8740bca66e652108f21b23
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b226773fed8740bca66e652108f21b23
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b226773fed8740bca66e652108f21b232021-11-16T04:09:02ZResearch Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks0032-579110.1016/j.psj.2021.101520https://doaj.org/article/b226773fed8740bca66e652108f21b232022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121005423https://doaj.org/toc/0032-5791ABSTRACT: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/1) and subjected to 2 rearing methods (furnished cage and plastic wire-floor) until d 63. Growth performance was measured in all birds. Three males and 3 females from each replicate were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the carcass yield and meat quality. In terms of growth performance, the rearing method affected the final body weight, average daily feed intake, and average daily gain, which were higher in the cage group (P < 0.05) than in the floor group, with a similar feed/gain in both groups. For slaughter performance, ducks in the cage group showed a higher abdominal fat yield and lower gizzard yield than those in the floor group (P < 0.05). For meat quality, the L* value of the breast muscle was higher in the cage group than in the floor group (P < 0.05). The pH recorded at 1 h was lower and pH recorded at 24 h was higher in the cage group (P < 0.05). The shear force and water loss rate were both lower in the cage group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the moisture content was lower and intramuscular fat content was higher in ducks fed in cages (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that the cage rearing system improved the growth performance and meat quality of ducks, which is appropriate for small-sized meat ducks.H. BaiB. YangZ. DongX. LiQ. SongY. JiangG. ChangG. ChenElsevierarticlemeat duckrearing systemgrowth performancecarcass yieldmeat qualityAnimal cultureSF1-1100ENPoultry Science, Vol 101, Iss 1, Pp 101520- (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic meat duck
rearing system
growth performance
carcass yield
meat quality
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle meat duck
rearing system
growth performance
carcass yield
meat quality
Animal culture
SF1-1100
H. Bai
B. Yang
Z. Dong
X. Li
Q. Song
Y. Jiang
G. Chang
G. Chen
Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
description ABSTRACT: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rearing methods on the growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of small-sized meat ducks. A total of 420 healthy 21-day-old birds was randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (6 replicates per treatment, sex ratio 1/1) and subjected to 2 rearing methods (furnished cage and plastic wire-floor) until d 63. Growth performance was measured in all birds. Three males and 3 females from each replicate were randomly selected and evaluated to determine the carcass yield and meat quality. In terms of growth performance, the rearing method affected the final body weight, average daily feed intake, and average daily gain, which were higher in the cage group (P < 0.05) than in the floor group, with a similar feed/gain in both groups. For slaughter performance, ducks in the cage group showed a higher abdominal fat yield and lower gizzard yield than those in the floor group (P < 0.05). For meat quality, the L* value of the breast muscle was higher in the cage group than in the floor group (P < 0.05). The pH recorded at 1 h was lower and pH recorded at 24 h was higher in the cage group (P < 0.05). The shear force and water loss rate were both lower in the cage group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the moisture content was lower and intramuscular fat content was higher in ducks fed in cages (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that the cage rearing system improved the growth performance and meat quality of ducks, which is appropriate for small-sized meat ducks.
format article
author H. Bai
B. Yang
Z. Dong
X. Li
Q. Song
Y. Jiang
G. Chang
G. Chen
author_facet H. Bai
B. Yang
Z. Dong
X. Li
Q. Song
Y. Jiang
G. Chang
G. Chen
author_sort H. Bai
title Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_short Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_full Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_fullStr Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: Effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
title_sort research note: effects of cage and floor rearing systems on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in small-sized meat ducks
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/b226773fed8740bca66e652108f21b23
work_keys_str_mv AT hbai researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT byang researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT zdong researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT xli researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT qsong researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT yjiang researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT gchang researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
AT gchen researchnoteeffectsofcageandfloorrearingsystemsongrowthperformancecarcasstraitsandmeatqualityinsmallsizedmeatducks
_version_ 1718426806346842112