Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rossella Mazzilli, Norina Imbrogno, Jlenia Elia, Michele Delfino, Olimpia Bitterman, Angela Napoli, Fernando Mazzilli Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Unit of Diabetology and Endocrinology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy Background: The aim of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzilli R, Imbrogno N, Elia J, Delfino M, Bitterman O, Napoli A, Mazzilli F
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b23b732be2084f6992a8d1e32cfce40e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b23b732be2084f6992a8d1e32cfce40e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b23b732be2084f6992a8d1e32cfce40e2021-12-02T06:15:11ZSexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus1178-7007https://doaj.org/article/b23b732be2084f6992a8d1e32cfce40e2015-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/sexual-dysfunction-in-diabetic-women-prevalence-and-differences-in-typ-peer-reviewed-article-DMSOhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-7007 Rossella Mazzilli, Norina Imbrogno, Jlenia Elia, Michele Delfino, Olimpia Bitterman, Angela Napoli, Fernando Mazzilli Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Unit of Diabetology and Endocrinology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy Background: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. Results: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. Conclusion: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction. Keywords: diabetes mellitus, female sexuality, Female Sexual Function IndexMazzilli RImbrogno NElia JDelfino MBitterman ONapoli AMazzilli FDove Medical PressarticleSpecialties of internal medicineRC581-951ENDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 97-101 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
spellingShingle Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
Mazzilli R
Imbrogno N
Elia J
Delfino M
Bitterman O
Napoli A
Mazzilli F
Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
description Rossella Mazzilli, Norina Imbrogno, Jlenia Elia, Michele Delfino, Olimpia Bitterman, Angela Napoli, Fernando Mazzilli Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Unit of Diabetology and Endocrinology, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy Background: The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on female sexuality and to highlight any differences between sexuality in the context of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The subjects selected were 49 women with type 1 DM, 24 women with type 2 DM, and 45 healthy women as controls. Each participant was given the nine-item Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire to complete. The metabolic profile was evaluated by body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin assay. Results: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (total score ≤30) was significantly higher in the type 1 DM group (25/49, 51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31) than in the control group (4/45, 9%; 95% CI 3–5; P=0.00006); there were no significant variations in the type 2 DM group (4/24, 17%; 95% CI 3–4) versus the control group (P=0.630, not statistically significant). The mean total score was significantly lower in the type 1 DM group (30.2±6.9) versus the control group (36.5±4.9; P=0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the type 2 DM group and the control group (P=0.773). With regard to specific questionnaire items, the mean values for arousal, lubrication, dyspareunia, and orgasm were significantly lower only in the type 1 DM group versus the control group. The mean values for desire were reduced in type 1 and type 2 DM groups versus control group. Conclusion: Type 1 DM is associated with sexual dysfunction. This may be due to classic neurovascular complications or to the negative impact of the disease on psychosocial factors. Larger and ideally longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between DM and sexual dysfunction. Keywords: diabetes mellitus, female sexuality, Female Sexual Function Index
format article
author Mazzilli R
Imbrogno N
Elia J
Delfino M
Bitterman O
Napoli A
Mazzilli F
author_facet Mazzilli R
Imbrogno N
Elia J
Delfino M
Bitterman O
Napoli A
Mazzilli F
author_sort Mazzilli R
title Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort sexual dysfunction in diabetic women: prevalence and differences in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/b23b732be2084f6992a8d1e32cfce40e
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzillir sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT imbrognon sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT eliaj sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT delfinom sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT bittermano sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT napolia sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
AT mazzillif sexualdysfunctionindiabeticwomenprevalenceanddifferencesintype1andtype2diabetesmellitus
_version_ 1718400010479992832