Steganography based on quotient value differencing and pixel value correlation
Abstract Pixel value differencing (PVD) steganography techniques produce imperceptible stego‐images. Most PVD‐based techniques have a fall‐off boundary problem (FOBP). To avoid FOBP, a steganographic scheme is presented that combines the quotient value difference (QVD) with pixel value correlation (...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b24afb7059884fafa65867659d4d1ea5 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Abstract Pixel value differencing (PVD) steganography techniques produce imperceptible stego‐images. Most PVD‐based techniques have a fall‐off boundary problem (FOBP). To avoid FOBP, a steganographic scheme is presented that combines the quotient value difference (QVD) with pixel value correlation (PVC). It performs data embedding in two stages on 3 × 3 size pixel blocks. The first stage of the embedding procedure performs QVD and remainder substitution on five pixels. These five pixels are central pixel and it's neighbours on the left, right, upper, and lower sides. Based on the new values of these five pixels, the PVC embedding procedure is applied on the remaining four corner pixels of the block. The experimental results are found to be improved. The hiding capacity is high that is 3.92 bits per byte with an acceptable peak signal‐to‐noise ratio value. A security check was performed using two tests: (i) a regular‐singular (RS) test, (ii) a pixel difference histogram (PDH) test. The experimental outcomes demonstrate that PDH curves of the stego‐images do not have a zigzag shape, that means the PDH test could not detect this steganography technique. Furthermore, the RS curves show that the RS test could not detect this steganography technique. |
|---|