The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial

Abstract The mechanisms underlying pain relief following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are not understood fully although biomechanical and neurophysiological processes have been proposed. As such, we designed this randomized trial to elucidate the contributions of biomechanical and neurophysiolo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casper Glissmann Nim, Gregory Neil Kawchuk, Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, Søren O’Neill
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b26a882c8ea848cdb126e4ac8a971080
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b26a882c8ea848cdb126e4ac8a971080
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b26a882c8ea848cdb126e4ac8a9710802021-12-02T19:04:11ZThe effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial10.1038/s41598-020-71557-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b26a882c8ea848cdb126e4ac8a9710802020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71557-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The mechanisms underlying pain relief following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are not understood fully although biomechanical and neurophysiological processes have been proposed. As such, we designed this randomized trial to elucidate the contributions of biomechanical and neurophysiological processes. A total of 132 participants with low back pain were randomly assigned to receive SMT at either the lumbar segment measured as the stiffest or the segment measured as having the lowest pain threshold. The primary outcome was patient reported low back pain intensity following treatment. Secondary outcomes were biomechanical stiffness and neurophysiological pressure pain threshold. All outcomes were measured at baseline, after the fourth and final session and at 2-weeks follow-up. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models, and demonstrated that the SMT application site did not influence patient reported low back pain intensity or stiffness. However, a large and significant difference in pressure pain threshold was observed between groups. This study provides support that SMT impacts neurophysiological parameters through a segment-dependent neurological reflex pathway, although this do not seem to be a proxy for improvement. This study was limited by the assumption that the applied treatment was sufficient to impact the primary outcome.Casper Glissmann NimGregory Neil KawchukBerit Schiøttz-ChristensenSøren O’NeillNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Casper Glissmann Nim
Gregory Neil Kawchuk
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Søren O’Neill
The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
description Abstract The mechanisms underlying pain relief following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are not understood fully although biomechanical and neurophysiological processes have been proposed. As such, we designed this randomized trial to elucidate the contributions of biomechanical and neurophysiological processes. A total of 132 participants with low back pain were randomly assigned to receive SMT at either the lumbar segment measured as the stiffest or the segment measured as having the lowest pain threshold. The primary outcome was patient reported low back pain intensity following treatment. Secondary outcomes were biomechanical stiffness and neurophysiological pressure pain threshold. All outcomes were measured at baseline, after the fourth and final session and at 2-weeks follow-up. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models, and demonstrated that the SMT application site did not influence patient reported low back pain intensity or stiffness. However, a large and significant difference in pressure pain threshold was observed between groups. This study provides support that SMT impacts neurophysiological parameters through a segment-dependent neurological reflex pathway, although this do not seem to be a proxy for improvement. This study was limited by the assumption that the applied treatment was sufficient to impact the primary outcome.
format article
author Casper Glissmann Nim
Gregory Neil Kawchuk
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Søren O’Neill
author_facet Casper Glissmann Nim
Gregory Neil Kawchuk
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Søren O’Neill
author_sort Casper Glissmann Nim
title The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
title_short The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
title_full The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
title_fullStr The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
title_sort effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/b26a882c8ea848cdb126e4ac8a971080
work_keys_str_mv AT casperglissmannnim theeffectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT gregoryneilkawchuk theeffectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT beritschiøttzchristensen theeffectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT sørenoneill theeffectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT casperglissmannnim effectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT gregoryneilkawchuk effectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT beritschiøttzchristensen effectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
AT sørenoneill effectonclinicaloutcomeswhentargetingspinalmanipulationatstiffnessorpainsensitivityarandomizedtrial
_version_ 1718377231338700800