Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients

ABSTRACT Both antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) using ethanol-based disinfectants (EBDs) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important means of infection control to prevent seasonal influenza A virus (IAV) outbreaks. However, previous reports suggest a reduced efficacy of ethanol disinfection against...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryohei Hirose, Takaaki Nakaya, Yuji Naito, Tomo Daidoji, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Naohisa Yoshida, Hideyuki Konishi, Yoshito Itoh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b281382f0a6a4368937f6f6791e3e738
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b281382f0a6a4368937f6f6791e3e738
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b281382f0a6a4368937f6f6791e3e7382021-11-15T15:27:33ZSituations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients10.1128/mSphere.00474-192379-5042https://doaj.org/article/b281382f0a6a4368937f6f6791e3e7382019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mSphere.00474-19https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042ABSTRACT Both antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) using ethanol-based disinfectants (EBDs) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important means of infection control to prevent seasonal influenza A virus (IAV) outbreaks. However, previous reports suggest a reduced efficacy of ethanol disinfection against pathogens in mucus. We aimed to elucidate the situations and mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of EBDs against IAV in infectious mucus. We evaluated IAV inactivation and ethanol concentration change using IAV-infected patients’ mucus (sputum). Additionally, AHR and AHW effectiveness against infectious mucus adhering to the hands and fingers was evaluated in 10 volunteers. Our clinical study showed that EBD effectiveness against IAV in mucus was extremely reduced compared to IAV in saline. IAV in mucus remained active despite 120 s of AHR; however, IAV in saline was completely inactivated within 30 s. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the time required for the ethanol concentration to reach an IAV inactivation level and thus for EBDs to completely inactivate IAV was approximately eight times longer in mucus than in saline. On the other hand, AHR inactivated IAV in mucus within 30 s when the mucus dried completely because the hydrogel characteristics were lost. Additionally, AHW rapidly inactivated IAV. Until infectious mucus has completely dried, infectious IAV can remain on the hands and fingers, even after appropriate AHR using EBD, thereby increasing the risk of IAV transmission. We clarified the ineffectiveness of EBD use against IAV in infectious mucus. IMPORTANCE Antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important to prevent the spread of influenza A virus (IAV). This study elucidated the situations/mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of AHR against infectious mucus derived from IAV-infected individuals and indicated the weaknesses of the current hand hygiene regimens. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the efficacy of AHR using ethanol-based disinfectant against mucus is greatly reduced until infectious mucus adhering to the hands/fingers has completely dried. If there is insufficient time before treating the next patient (i.e., if the infectious mucus is not completely dry), medical staff should be aware that effectiveness of AHR is reduced. Since AHW is effective against both dry and nondry infectious mucus, AHW should be adopted to compensate for these weaknesses of AHR.Ryohei HiroseTakaaki NakayaYuji NaitoTomo DaidojiRisa BandouKen InoueOsamu DohiNaohisa YoshidaHideyuki KonishiYoshito ItohAmerican Society for Microbiologyarticlehand hygieneantiseptic hand rubbingantiseptic hand washingethanol-based disinfectantviscositymucusMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmSphere, Vol 4, Iss 5 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic hand hygiene
antiseptic hand rubbing
antiseptic hand washing
ethanol-based disinfectant
viscosity
mucus
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle hand hygiene
antiseptic hand rubbing
antiseptic hand washing
ethanol-based disinfectant
viscosity
mucus
Microbiology
QR1-502
Ryohei Hirose
Takaaki Nakaya
Yuji Naito
Tomo Daidoji
Risa Bandou
Ken Inoue
Osamu Dohi
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideyuki Konishi
Yoshito Itoh
Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
description ABSTRACT Both antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) using ethanol-based disinfectants (EBDs) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important means of infection control to prevent seasonal influenza A virus (IAV) outbreaks. However, previous reports suggest a reduced efficacy of ethanol disinfection against pathogens in mucus. We aimed to elucidate the situations and mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of EBDs against IAV in infectious mucus. We evaluated IAV inactivation and ethanol concentration change using IAV-infected patients’ mucus (sputum). Additionally, AHR and AHW effectiveness against infectious mucus adhering to the hands and fingers was evaluated in 10 volunteers. Our clinical study showed that EBD effectiveness against IAV in mucus was extremely reduced compared to IAV in saline. IAV in mucus remained active despite 120 s of AHR; however, IAV in saline was completely inactivated within 30 s. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the time required for the ethanol concentration to reach an IAV inactivation level and thus for EBDs to completely inactivate IAV was approximately eight times longer in mucus than in saline. On the other hand, AHR inactivated IAV in mucus within 30 s when the mucus dried completely because the hydrogel characteristics were lost. Additionally, AHW rapidly inactivated IAV. Until infectious mucus has completely dried, infectious IAV can remain on the hands and fingers, even after appropriate AHR using EBD, thereby increasing the risk of IAV transmission. We clarified the ineffectiveness of EBD use against IAV in infectious mucus. IMPORTANCE Antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important to prevent the spread of influenza A virus (IAV). This study elucidated the situations/mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of AHR against infectious mucus derived from IAV-infected individuals and indicated the weaknesses of the current hand hygiene regimens. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the efficacy of AHR using ethanol-based disinfectant against mucus is greatly reduced until infectious mucus adhering to the hands/fingers has completely dried. If there is insufficient time before treating the next patient (i.e., if the infectious mucus is not completely dry), medical staff should be aware that effectiveness of AHR is reduced. Since AHW is effective against both dry and nondry infectious mucus, AHW should be adopted to compensate for these weaknesses of AHR.
format article
author Ryohei Hirose
Takaaki Nakaya
Yuji Naito
Tomo Daidoji
Risa Bandou
Ken Inoue
Osamu Dohi
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideyuki Konishi
Yoshito Itoh
author_facet Ryohei Hirose
Takaaki Nakaya
Yuji Naito
Tomo Daidoji
Risa Bandou
Ken Inoue
Osamu Dohi
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideyuki Konishi
Yoshito Itoh
author_sort Ryohei Hirose
title Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
title_short Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
title_full Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
title_fullStr Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
title_full_unstemmed Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients
title_sort situations leading to reduced effectiveness of current hand hygiene against infectious mucus from influenza virus-infected patients
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/b281382f0a6a4368937f6f6791e3e738
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoheihirose situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT takaakinakaya situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT yujinaito situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT tomodaidoji situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT risabandou situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT keninoue situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT osamudohi situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT naohisayoshida situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT hideyukikonishi situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
AT yoshitoitoh situationsleadingtoreducedeffectivenessofcurrenthandhygieneagainstinfectiousmucusfrominfluenzavirusinfectedpatients
_version_ 1718427972152590336