Apostasy in Islam

This lucid and concise book is an important and timely contribution in light of current intra-Muslim political rivalries that find their fueling justifications in the domain of “excommunication” and mutual accusations of disbelief and apostasy (takfīr). This situation has caused Alalwani, the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Amr G.E. Sabet
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b2eb90eaee7a49b0890cdbfd605e9771
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b2eb90eaee7a49b0890cdbfd605e9771
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b2eb90eaee7a49b0890cdbfd605e97712021-12-02T19:23:13ZApostasy in Islam10.35632/ajis.v30i4.10892690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/b2eb90eaee7a49b0890cdbfd605e97712013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1089https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741This lucid and concise book is an important and timely contribution in light of current intra-Muslim political rivalries that find their fueling justifications in the domain of “excommunication” and mutual accusations of disbelief and apostasy (takfīr). This situation has caused Alalwani, the author of this “treatise,” to delve into the controversies and subtleties of this sensitive and manipulation-laden issue. He attempts, both scripturally and logically, to clarify its various aspects and challenge the conventional and traditional approaches to it, which have been obscured by the historical weight of dogma and power politics (pp. 19-20, 129). Alalwani’s contends that there is no explicitly stated evidence, whether from the Qur’an or the Prophet’s Sunnah, that mandates the death penalty for merely changing one’s religion, as long as doing so is not accompanied or associated with another criminal act. He highlights that when stipulating that an apostate should be killed, the jurists were in fact dealing with “compound” crimes that involved, in addition to apostasy, other political, legal, and social dimensions (p. 1). He proceeds to make his point by providing evidence from the Qur’an and the Sunnah while casting doubt on the authenticity or consistency of much of what the fuqahā’ (jurists and scholars) narrated later on and attributed to the Prophet or his Companions. His chosen method combines philosophical, analytical, inductive, and historical approaches along with Islamic textual sciences and fields of knowledge (p. 3). He focuses on cases in which an individual changes his/her faith without engaging in hostile or criminal activities against the Muslim community, which otherwise would elevate the case to one of security threat or treason (p. 4). The study comprises six chapters. The first two deal with whether apostasy is a capital crime and with the Qur’anic depiction of what apostasy means. Alalwani points out that despite unleashing the “sword of consensus” regarding the death penalty for this event, in fact there is no such consensus, for no ... Amr G.E. SabetInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 30, Iss 4 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Amr G.E. Sabet
Apostasy in Islam
description This lucid and concise book is an important and timely contribution in light of current intra-Muslim political rivalries that find their fueling justifications in the domain of “excommunication” and mutual accusations of disbelief and apostasy (takfīr). This situation has caused Alalwani, the author of this “treatise,” to delve into the controversies and subtleties of this sensitive and manipulation-laden issue. He attempts, both scripturally and logically, to clarify its various aspects and challenge the conventional and traditional approaches to it, which have been obscured by the historical weight of dogma and power politics (pp. 19-20, 129). Alalwani’s contends that there is no explicitly stated evidence, whether from the Qur’an or the Prophet’s Sunnah, that mandates the death penalty for merely changing one’s religion, as long as doing so is not accompanied or associated with another criminal act. He highlights that when stipulating that an apostate should be killed, the jurists were in fact dealing with “compound” crimes that involved, in addition to apostasy, other political, legal, and social dimensions (p. 1). He proceeds to make his point by providing evidence from the Qur’an and the Sunnah while casting doubt on the authenticity or consistency of much of what the fuqahā’ (jurists and scholars) narrated later on and attributed to the Prophet or his Companions. His chosen method combines philosophical, analytical, inductive, and historical approaches along with Islamic textual sciences and fields of knowledge (p. 3). He focuses on cases in which an individual changes his/her faith without engaging in hostile or criminal activities against the Muslim community, which otherwise would elevate the case to one of security threat or treason (p. 4). The study comprises six chapters. The first two deal with whether apostasy is a capital crime and with the Qur’anic depiction of what apostasy means. Alalwani points out that despite unleashing the “sword of consensus” regarding the death penalty for this event, in fact there is no such consensus, for no ...
format article
author Amr G.E. Sabet
author_facet Amr G.E. Sabet
author_sort Amr G.E. Sabet
title Apostasy in Islam
title_short Apostasy in Islam
title_full Apostasy in Islam
title_fullStr Apostasy in Islam
title_full_unstemmed Apostasy in Islam
title_sort apostasy in islam
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/b2eb90eaee7a49b0890cdbfd605e9771
work_keys_str_mv AT amrgesabet apostasyinislam
_version_ 1718376637129555968