Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema

Abstract: In the article we analyze the evolution of the idea of self-sacrifice of a scientist in Soviet-Russian cinema (from 1930th until now). The research is based on Weber-Merton’s assumption that the development of modern science stemmed from religion. And in this sense scientific work could be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: S. M. Medvedeva
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b2f441d17f1b4b738990f7d2086aa8fb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b2f441d17f1b4b738990f7d2086aa8fb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b2f441d17f1b4b738990f7d2086aa8fb2021-11-23T14:51:00ZSelf-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2015-5-44-231-239https://doaj.org/article/b2f441d17f1b4b738990f7d2086aa8fb2015-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/439https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099Abstract: In the article we analyze the evolution of the idea of self-sacrifice of a scientist in Soviet-Russian cinema (from 1930th until now). The research is based on Weber-Merton’s assumption that the development of modern science stemmed from religion. And in this sense scientific work could be regarded as a kind of religious activity. As a result a number of traits (more typical for a priest) were attributed to a scientist. Such traits are the following: self-sacrifice (in the name of science), asceticism, deep devotion to ideals, etc. As it is shown in the article these pseudoreligious traits remain unchanged in the cinematographic images of scientists. In the article we ague, that the subject of self-sacrifice of a scientist was pictured by Soviet-Russian cinema during its whole history. This ability to self-sacrifice serves as a criterion to prove that a scientist is a true scientist. Nevertheless, it is possible to separate out three periods of picturing of self-sacrifice according to implicit sense of action: 1) period of Stalin’s cinema (1930th-1950th); 2) period of Thaw and Stagnation (1960th-1980th); 3) postsoviet cinema (until now). Each period has its unique tradition of presentation of self-sacrifice of a scientist. Finally we ague, that in the late soviet time appeared a trend to show the sacrifice in the name of science as a senseless and useless action. Scientists in the cinema either lost their ability to self-sacrifice or they sacrificed in vain. In post soviet cinema such tragic attitudes increased: now a scientist has to sacrifice himself on purpose to give up science. It means that science doesn’t worth sacrifice any more. This tendency reveal deep moral crisis among modern Russian intelligentsia.S. M. MedvedevaMGIMO University Pressarticlecinemasciencereligionethicsethics of scienceimage of a scientistmoral choiceself-sacrificecreativityInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(44), Pp 231-239 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic cinema
science
religion
ethics
ethics of science
image of a scientist
moral choice
self-sacrifice
creativity
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle cinema
science
religion
ethics
ethics of science
image of a scientist
moral choice
self-sacrifice
creativity
International relations
JZ2-6530
S. M. Medvedeva
Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
description Abstract: In the article we analyze the evolution of the idea of self-sacrifice of a scientist in Soviet-Russian cinema (from 1930th until now). The research is based on Weber-Merton’s assumption that the development of modern science stemmed from religion. And in this sense scientific work could be regarded as a kind of religious activity. As a result a number of traits (more typical for a priest) were attributed to a scientist. Such traits are the following: self-sacrifice (in the name of science), asceticism, deep devotion to ideals, etc. As it is shown in the article these pseudoreligious traits remain unchanged in the cinematographic images of scientists. In the article we ague, that the subject of self-sacrifice of a scientist was pictured by Soviet-Russian cinema during its whole history. This ability to self-sacrifice serves as a criterion to prove that a scientist is a true scientist. Nevertheless, it is possible to separate out three periods of picturing of self-sacrifice according to implicit sense of action: 1) period of Stalin’s cinema (1930th-1950th); 2) period of Thaw and Stagnation (1960th-1980th); 3) postsoviet cinema (until now). Each period has its unique tradition of presentation of self-sacrifice of a scientist. Finally we ague, that in the late soviet time appeared a trend to show the sacrifice in the name of science as a senseless and useless action. Scientists in the cinema either lost their ability to self-sacrifice or they sacrificed in vain. In post soviet cinema such tragic attitudes increased: now a scientist has to sacrifice himself on purpose to give up science. It means that science doesn’t worth sacrifice any more. This tendency reveal deep moral crisis among modern Russian intelligentsia.
format article
author S. M. Medvedeva
author_facet S. M. Medvedeva
author_sort S. M. Medvedeva
title Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
title_short Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
title_full Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
title_fullStr Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
title_full_unstemmed Self-Sacrifice of a Scientist in Soviet-Russian Cinema
title_sort self-sacrifice of a scientist in soviet-russian cinema
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/b2f441d17f1b4b738990f7d2086aa8fb
work_keys_str_mv AT smmedvedeva selfsacrificeofascientistinsovietrussiancinema
_version_ 1718416298762829824