RandCrowns: A Quantitative Metric for Imprecisely Labeled Tree Crown Delineation
Supervised methods for object delineation in remote sensing require labeled ground-truth data. Gathering sufficient high quality ground-truth data is difficult, especially when targets are of irregular shape or difficult to distinguish from background or neighboring objects. Tree crown delineation p...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
IEEE
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b3004e22a27c4369a7331fd04e2a81c8 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Supervised methods for object delineation in remote sensing require labeled ground-truth data. Gathering sufficient high quality ground-truth data is difficult, especially when targets are of irregular shape or difficult to distinguish from background or neighboring objects. Tree crown delineation provides key information from remote sensing images for forestry, ecology, and management. However, tree crowns in remote sensing imagery are often difficult to label and annotate due to irregular shape, overlapping canopies, shadowing, and indistinct edges. There are also multiple approaches to annotation in this field (e.g., rectangular boxes vs. convex polygons) that further contribute to annotation imprecision. However, current evaluation methods do not account for this uncertainty in annotations, and quantitative metrics for evaluation can vary across multiple annotators. In this article, we address these limitations by developing an adaptation of the Rand index (RI) for weakly labeled crown delineation that we call RandCrowns (RC). Our new RC evaluation metric provides a method to appropriately evaluate delineated tree crowns while taking into account imprecision in the ground-truth delineations. The RC metric reformulates the RI by adjusting the areas over which each term of the index is computed to account for uncertain and imprecise object delineation labels. Quantitative comparisons to the commonly used intersection over union method show a decrease in the variance generated by differences among multiple annotators. Combined with qualitative examples, our results suggest that the RC metric is more robust for scoring target delineations in the presence of uncertainty and imprecision in annotations that are inherent to tree crown delineation. |
|---|