Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers

Abstract Background Incidence of testicular cancer is highest among young adults and has been increasing dramatically for men born since 1945. This study aimed to elucidate the factors driving this trend by investigating differences in mutational signatures by age of onset. Methods We retrieved soma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicole E. Mealey, Dylan E. O’Sullivan, Cheryl E. Peters, Daniel Y. C. Heng, Darren R. Brenner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b300a6f7c3ce458089ca8c690cc00b74
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b300a6f7c3ce458089ca8c690cc00b74
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b300a6f7c3ce458089ca8c690cc00b742021-11-28T12:06:04ZMutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers10.1186/s12920-021-01121-81755-8794https://doaj.org/article/b300a6f7c3ce458089ca8c690cc00b742021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-01121-8https://doaj.org/toc/1755-8794Abstract Background Incidence of testicular cancer is highest among young adults and has been increasing dramatically for men born since 1945. This study aimed to elucidate the factors driving this trend by investigating differences in mutational signatures by age of onset. Methods We retrieved somatic variant and clinical data pertaining to 135 testicular tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We compared mutational load, prevalence of specific mutated genes, mutation types, and mutational signatures between age of onset groups (< 30 years, 30–39 years, ≥ 40 years) after adjusting for subtype. A recursively partitioned mixture model was utilized to characterize combinations of signatures among the young-onset cases. Results Mutational load was significantly higher among older-onset tumors (p < 0.05). There were no highly prevalent driver mutations among young-onset tumors. Mutated genes and types of nucleotide mutations were not significantly different by age group (p > 0.05). Signatures 1, 8 and 29 were more common among young-onset tumors, while signatures 11 and 16 had higher prevalence among older-onset tumors (p < 0.05). Among young-onset tumors, clustering of signatures resulted in four distinct tumor classes. Conclusions Signature contributions differ by age with signatures 1, 8 and 29 were more common among younger-onset tumors. While these signatures are connected with endogenous deamination of 5-methylcytosine, late replication errors and chewing tobacco, respectively, additional research is needed to further elucidate the etiology of young-onset testicular cancer. Large studies of mutational signatures among young-onset patients are required to understand epidemiologic trends as well as inform targeted prevention and treatment strategies.Nicole E. MealeyDylan E. O’SullivanCheryl E. PetersDaniel Y. C. HengDarren R. BrennerBMCarticleMutational signaturesTesticular neoplasmsYoung-onsetGenomicsSomatic mutationsInternal medicineRC31-1245GeneticsQH426-470ENBMC Medical Genomics, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Mutational signatures
Testicular neoplasms
Young-onset
Genomics
Somatic mutations
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle Mutational signatures
Testicular neoplasms
Young-onset
Genomics
Somatic mutations
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
Genetics
QH426-470
Nicole E. Mealey
Dylan E. O’Sullivan
Cheryl E. Peters
Daniel Y. C. Heng
Darren R. Brenner
Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
description Abstract Background Incidence of testicular cancer is highest among young adults and has been increasing dramatically for men born since 1945. This study aimed to elucidate the factors driving this trend by investigating differences in mutational signatures by age of onset. Methods We retrieved somatic variant and clinical data pertaining to 135 testicular tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We compared mutational load, prevalence of specific mutated genes, mutation types, and mutational signatures between age of onset groups (< 30 years, 30–39 years, ≥ 40 years) after adjusting for subtype. A recursively partitioned mixture model was utilized to characterize combinations of signatures among the young-onset cases. Results Mutational load was significantly higher among older-onset tumors (p < 0.05). There were no highly prevalent driver mutations among young-onset tumors. Mutated genes and types of nucleotide mutations were not significantly different by age group (p > 0.05). Signatures 1, 8 and 29 were more common among young-onset tumors, while signatures 11 and 16 had higher prevalence among older-onset tumors (p < 0.05). Among young-onset tumors, clustering of signatures resulted in four distinct tumor classes. Conclusions Signature contributions differ by age with signatures 1, 8 and 29 were more common among younger-onset tumors. While these signatures are connected with endogenous deamination of 5-methylcytosine, late replication errors and chewing tobacco, respectively, additional research is needed to further elucidate the etiology of young-onset testicular cancer. Large studies of mutational signatures among young-onset patients are required to understand epidemiologic trends as well as inform targeted prevention and treatment strategies.
format article
author Nicole E. Mealey
Dylan E. O’Sullivan
Cheryl E. Peters
Daniel Y. C. Heng
Darren R. Brenner
author_facet Nicole E. Mealey
Dylan E. O’Sullivan
Cheryl E. Peters
Daniel Y. C. Heng
Darren R. Brenner
author_sort Nicole E. Mealey
title Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
title_short Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
title_full Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
title_fullStr Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
title_full_unstemmed Mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
title_sort mutational signatures among young-onset testicular cancers
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b300a6f7c3ce458089ca8c690cc00b74
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleemealey mutationalsignaturesamongyoungonsettesticularcancers
AT dylaneosullivan mutationalsignaturesamongyoungonsettesticularcancers
AT cherylepeters mutationalsignaturesamongyoungonsettesticularcancers
AT danielycheng mutationalsignaturesamongyoungonsettesticularcancers
AT darrenrbrenner mutationalsignaturesamongyoungonsettesticularcancers
_version_ 1718408220743041024