Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity

The concept of identity reflects the ongoing shifts in political theories when external parameters that did not previously fall into the optics of political research become a part of political reflection and political analysis. Emphasizing sociocultural issues captures not only the departure from th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maria M. Mchedlova, Hovhannes L. Sargsyan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2021
Materias:
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b3352232d7af4e25b0bab4252b41dbfe
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b3352232d7af4e25b0bab4252b41dbfe
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b3352232d7af4e25b0bab4252b41dbfe2021-11-26T15:41:03ZCivic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity2313-14382313-144610.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-648-658https://doaj.org/article/b3352232d7af4e25b0bab4252b41dbfe2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/29537/20042https://doaj.org/toc/2313-1438https://doaj.org/toc/2313-1446The concept of identity reflects the ongoing shifts in political theories when external parameters that did not previously fall into the optics of political research become a part of political reflection and political analysis. Emphasizing sociocultural issues captures not only the departure from the linear normativity of political theory and pragmatics but also the search for modern explanatory models that cannot be reduced merely to institutional determinism. The controversy and ambiguity of the civic identity concept are imposed on the need for interpreting the formation of civic communities in the newly emerged independent countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union (on the example of Russia and Armenia), including the possibilities of protest and project identity. Methodologically the article is based on the perception that the construction of civic identity cannot be reduced to the normative understanding only. The authors bring out the causal complexes that predetermine the construction of civic identity, while also highlighting the differences in how civic communities and their value focuses are perceived and constructed in Russia and Armenia. The authors also define the general features of civic identity, which can be described as a common basis of solidarity, the removal of particularity and a shared vision of the future.Maria M. MchedlovaHovhannes L. SargsyanPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)articleidentitycivic identityresistance identityproject identitysolidaritynationrussiaarmeniaPolitical scienceJENRURUDN Journal of Political Science, Vol 23, Iss 4, Pp 648-658 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic identity
civic identity
resistance identity
project identity
solidarity
nation
russia
armenia
Political science
J
spellingShingle identity
civic identity
resistance identity
project identity
solidarity
nation
russia
armenia
Political science
J
Maria M. Mchedlova
Hovhannes L. Sargsyan
Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
description The concept of identity reflects the ongoing shifts in political theories when external parameters that did not previously fall into the optics of political research become a part of political reflection and political analysis. Emphasizing sociocultural issues captures not only the departure from the linear normativity of political theory and pragmatics but also the search for modern explanatory models that cannot be reduced merely to institutional determinism. The controversy and ambiguity of the civic identity concept are imposed on the need for interpreting the formation of civic communities in the newly emerged independent countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union (on the example of Russia and Armenia), including the possibilities of protest and project identity. Methodologically the article is based on the perception that the construction of civic identity cannot be reduced to the normative understanding only. The authors bring out the causal complexes that predetermine the construction of civic identity, while also highlighting the differences in how civic communities and their value focuses are perceived and constructed in Russia and Armenia. The authors also define the general features of civic identity, which can be described as a common basis of solidarity, the removal of particularity and a shared vision of the future.
format article
author Maria M. Mchedlova
Hovhannes L. Sargsyan
author_facet Maria M. Mchedlova
Hovhannes L. Sargsyan
author_sort Maria M. Mchedlova
title Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
title_short Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
title_full Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
title_fullStr Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
title_full_unstemmed Civic Identity: Diversity of Meanings and Achievement of Solidarity
title_sort civic identity: diversity of meanings and achievement of solidarity
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b3352232d7af4e25b0bab4252b41dbfe
work_keys_str_mv AT mariammchedlova civicidentitydiversityofmeaningsandachievementofsolidarity
AT hovhanneslsargsyan civicidentitydiversityofmeaningsandachievementofsolidarity
_version_ 1718409311375327232