Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.

Salmonella control strategies include vaccines that help reduce the spread of Salmonella in poultry flocks. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of administering a live Salmonella vaccine followed by a killed Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle (CNP) vaccine booster on the cellular and humoral immun...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva, Sankar Renu, Revathi Shanmugasundaram, Gabriel O Akerele, Renukaradhy J Gourapura, Ramesh K Selvaraj
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b35723cd363f418fbfbdb8cdcdff69fb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b35723cd363f418fbfbdb8cdcdff69fb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b35723cd363f418fbfbdb8cdcdff69fb2021-12-02T20:13:01ZSalmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259334https://doaj.org/article/b35723cd363f418fbfbdb8cdcdff69fb2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259334https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Salmonella control strategies include vaccines that help reduce the spread of Salmonella in poultry flocks. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of administering a live Salmonella vaccine followed by a killed Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle (CNP) vaccine booster on the cellular and humoral immunity of broilers. The CNP vaccine was synthesized with Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) outer-membrane-proteins (OMPs) and flagellin-proteins. At d1-of-age, one-hundred-sixty-eight chicks were allocated into treatments: 1) No vaccine, 2) Live vaccine (Poulvac®ST), 3) CNP vaccine, 4) Live+CNP vaccine. At d1-of-age, birds were orally vaccinated with PBS, Live vaccine, or CNP. At d7-of-age, the No vaccine, Live vaccine and CNP vaccine groups were boosted with PBS and the Live+CNP vaccine group was boosted with CNP. At d14-of-age, birds were challenged with 1×109 CFU/bird S. Enteritidis. There were no significant differences in body-weight-gain (BWG) or feed-conversion-ratio (FCR). At 8h-post-challenge, CNP and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 17% and 24% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgA in bile, respectively, compared to control. At d28-of-age, CNP, Live, and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 33%, 18%, and 24% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgA in bile, respectively, compared to control. At d14-of-age, Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 46% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgY in serum, compared to control. At d21-of-age, splenocytes from CNP and Live-vaccinated birds had increased (P<0.05) T-lymphocyte proliferation at 0.02 mg/mL OMPs stimulation compared to the control. At d28-of-age, CNP and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 0.9 Log10 CFU/g and 1 Log10 CFU/g decreased S. Enteritidis cecal loads (P<0.05), respectively, compared to control. The CNP vaccine does not have adverse effects on bird's BWG and FCR or IL-1β, IL-10, IFN-γ, or iNOS mRNA expression levels. It can be concluded that the CNP vaccine, as a first dose or as a booster vaccination, is an alternative vaccine candidate against S. Enteritidis in broilers.Keila Y Acevedo-VillanuevaSankar RenuRevathi ShanmugasundaramGabriel O AkereleRenukaradhy J GourapuraRamesh K SelvarajPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0259334 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva
Sankar Renu
Revathi Shanmugasundaram
Gabriel O Akerele
Renukaradhy J Gourapura
Ramesh K Selvaraj
Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
description Salmonella control strategies include vaccines that help reduce the spread of Salmonella in poultry flocks. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of administering a live Salmonella vaccine followed by a killed Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle (CNP) vaccine booster on the cellular and humoral immunity of broilers. The CNP vaccine was synthesized with Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) outer-membrane-proteins (OMPs) and flagellin-proteins. At d1-of-age, one-hundred-sixty-eight chicks were allocated into treatments: 1) No vaccine, 2) Live vaccine (Poulvac®ST), 3) CNP vaccine, 4) Live+CNP vaccine. At d1-of-age, birds were orally vaccinated with PBS, Live vaccine, or CNP. At d7-of-age, the No vaccine, Live vaccine and CNP vaccine groups were boosted with PBS and the Live+CNP vaccine group was boosted with CNP. At d14-of-age, birds were challenged with 1×109 CFU/bird S. Enteritidis. There were no significant differences in body-weight-gain (BWG) or feed-conversion-ratio (FCR). At 8h-post-challenge, CNP and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 17% and 24% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgA in bile, respectively, compared to control. At d28-of-age, CNP, Live, and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 33%, 18%, and 24% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgA in bile, respectively, compared to control. At d14-of-age, Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 46% greater levels (P<0.05) of anti-Salmonella OMPs IgY in serum, compared to control. At d21-of-age, splenocytes from CNP and Live-vaccinated birds had increased (P<0.05) T-lymphocyte proliferation at 0.02 mg/mL OMPs stimulation compared to the control. At d28-of-age, CNP and Live+CNP-vaccinated birds had 0.9 Log10 CFU/g and 1 Log10 CFU/g decreased S. Enteritidis cecal loads (P<0.05), respectively, compared to control. The CNP vaccine does not have adverse effects on bird's BWG and FCR or IL-1β, IL-10, IFN-γ, or iNOS mRNA expression levels. It can be concluded that the CNP vaccine, as a first dose or as a booster vaccination, is an alternative vaccine candidate against S. Enteritidis in broilers.
format article
author Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva
Sankar Renu
Revathi Shanmugasundaram
Gabriel O Akerele
Renukaradhy J Gourapura
Ramesh K Selvaraj
author_facet Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva
Sankar Renu
Revathi Shanmugasundaram
Gabriel O Akerele
Renukaradhy J Gourapura
Ramesh K Selvaraj
author_sort Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva
title Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
title_short Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
title_full Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
title_fullStr Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
title_full_unstemmed Salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler birds.
title_sort salmonella chitosan nanoparticle vaccine administration is protective against salmonella enteritidis in broiler birds.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b35723cd363f418fbfbdb8cdcdff69fb
work_keys_str_mv AT keilayacevedovillanueva salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
AT sankarrenu salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
AT revathishanmugasundaram salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
AT gabrieloakerele salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
AT renukaradhyjgourapura salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
AT rameshkselvaraj salmonellachitosannanoparticlevaccineadministrationisprotectiveagainstsalmonellaenteritidisinbroilerbirds
_version_ 1718374845006217216