Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress

Abstract Regarding their resistance five sealants were tested in vitro after experiencing mechanical, thermal and chemical stress. Included for testing were two fluoride varnishes: Fluor Protector [FP] (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Protecto CaF2 Nano One-Step Seal [PN] (BonaDent) and three fluoride-composi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christina Erbe, Florian Deckers, Irene Schmidtmann, Julia Heider, Heinrich Wehrbein
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b3b8a0a64c40461fb81bfe308af20b45
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b3b8a0a64c40461fb81bfe308af20b45
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b3b8a0a64c40461fb81bfe308af20b452021-12-02T14:21:21ZOptical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress10.1038/s41598-021-87288-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b3b8a0a64c40461fb81bfe308af20b452021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87288-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Regarding their resistance five sealants were tested in vitro after experiencing mechanical, thermal and chemical stress. Included for testing were two fluoride varnishes: Fluor Protector [FP] (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Protecto CaF2 Nano One-Step Seal [PN] (BonaDent) and three fluoride-composite filled sealants (with acid etch technique): Clinpro XT Varnish [CP] (3 M Espe), Pro Seal [PS] & Light Bond [LB] (Reliance Orthodontic Products) and a positive control group [CG] Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent). The sealants were applied on 180 bovine teeth (n = 10/ sealer) in a standardized manner after bracket bonding. Mechanical pressure and its effect by simulating different time points and standardized electric cleaning protocol was tested first. Followed by thermal burden due to varying thermal stress and thirdly change in pH stress imitating chemical exposure were examined separately. A digital microscope and a grid incisal and apical to the brackets (n = 32 fields) was used to standardize the optical analysis. Material loss due to mechanical stress compared to CG (score 0.00) was CP (1.2%), FP (21.5%), LB (22.2%) and PN (81.1%). No significant difference to CG presented PS. Material loss due to thermal stress was CP (0.5%), PS (2%), FP (2.6%), LB (3.1%) and PN (39.9%). Material loss due to chemical stress was FP (1.8%), PS (2.1%), LB (5.5%) and PN (39.6%). No significant difference to CG presented CP. Only PS and CP had optically provable, good resiliance to mechanical, thermal and chemical stress. Significantly poorer outcomes in particular showed PN.Christina ErbeFlorian DeckersIrene SchmidtmannJulia HeiderHeinrich WehrbeinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Christina Erbe
Florian Deckers
Irene Schmidtmann
Julia Heider
Heinrich Wehrbein
Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
description Abstract Regarding their resistance five sealants were tested in vitro after experiencing mechanical, thermal and chemical stress. Included for testing were two fluoride varnishes: Fluor Protector [FP] (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Protecto CaF2 Nano One-Step Seal [PN] (BonaDent) and three fluoride-composite filled sealants (with acid etch technique): Clinpro XT Varnish [CP] (3 M Espe), Pro Seal [PS] & Light Bond [LB] (Reliance Orthodontic Products) and a positive control group [CG] Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent). The sealants were applied on 180 bovine teeth (n = 10/ sealer) in a standardized manner after bracket bonding. Mechanical pressure and its effect by simulating different time points and standardized electric cleaning protocol was tested first. Followed by thermal burden due to varying thermal stress and thirdly change in pH stress imitating chemical exposure were examined separately. A digital microscope and a grid incisal and apical to the brackets (n = 32 fields) was used to standardize the optical analysis. Material loss due to mechanical stress compared to CG (score 0.00) was CP (1.2%), FP (21.5%), LB (22.2%) and PN (81.1%). No significant difference to CG presented PS. Material loss due to thermal stress was CP (0.5%), PS (2%), FP (2.6%), LB (3.1%) and PN (39.9%). Material loss due to chemical stress was FP (1.8%), PS (2.1%), LB (5.5%) and PN (39.6%). No significant difference to CG presented CP. Only PS and CP had optically provable, good resiliance to mechanical, thermal and chemical stress. Significantly poorer outcomes in particular showed PN.
format article
author Christina Erbe
Florian Deckers
Irene Schmidtmann
Julia Heider
Heinrich Wehrbein
author_facet Christina Erbe
Florian Deckers
Irene Schmidtmann
Julia Heider
Heinrich Wehrbein
author_sort Christina Erbe
title Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
title_short Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
title_full Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
title_fullStr Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
title_full_unstemmed Optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
title_sort optical analysis of the behavior of sealants under mechanical, thermal and chemical stress
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b3b8a0a64c40461fb81bfe308af20b45
work_keys_str_mv AT christinaerbe opticalanalysisofthebehaviorofsealantsundermechanicalthermalandchemicalstress
AT floriandeckers opticalanalysisofthebehaviorofsealantsundermechanicalthermalandchemicalstress
AT ireneschmidtmann opticalanalysisofthebehaviorofsealantsundermechanicalthermalandchemicalstress
AT juliaheider opticalanalysisofthebehaviorofsealantsundermechanicalthermalandchemicalstress
AT heinrichwehrbein opticalanalysisofthebehaviorofsealantsundermechanicalthermalandchemicalstress
_version_ 1718391568302342144