Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-maki...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cesar D. Lopez, BS, Anastasia Gazgalis, BS, Venkat Boddapati, MD, Roshan P. Shah, MD, H. John Cooper, MD, Jeffrey A. Geller, MD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b3bec2b6eaf7441792e10982e566bd6e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b3bec2b6eaf7441792e10982e566bd6e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b3bec2b6eaf7441792e10982e566bd6e2021-11-14T04:33:53ZArtificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review2352-344110.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012https://doaj.org/article/b3bec2b6eaf7441792e10982e566bd6e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121001308https://doaj.org/toc/2352-3441Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patient-reported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations.Cesar D. Lopez, BSAnastasia Gazgalis, BSVenkat Boddapati, MDRoshan P. Shah, MDH. John Cooper, MDJeffrey A. Geller, MDElsevierarticleMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDeep learningArtificial neural networksOrthopedic surgeryHip and knee arthroplastyOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENArthroplasty Today, Vol 11, Iss , Pp 103-112 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Machine learning
Artificial intelligence
Deep learning
Artificial neural networks
Orthopedic surgery
Hip and knee arthroplasty
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle Machine learning
Artificial intelligence
Deep learning
Artificial neural networks
Orthopedic surgery
Hip and knee arthroplasty
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Cesar D. Lopez, BS
Anastasia Gazgalis, BS
Venkat Boddapati, MD
Roshan P. Shah, MD
H. John Cooper, MD
Jeffrey A. Geller, MD
Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
description Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patient-reported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations.
format article
author Cesar D. Lopez, BS
Anastasia Gazgalis, BS
Venkat Boddapati, MD
Roshan P. Shah, MD
H. John Cooper, MD
Jeffrey A. Geller, MD
author_facet Cesar D. Lopez, BS
Anastasia Gazgalis, BS
Venkat Boddapati, MD
Roshan P. Shah, MD
H. John Cooper, MD
Jeffrey A. Geller, MD
author_sort Cesar D. Lopez, BS
title Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_short Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_sort artificial learning and machine learning decision guidance applications in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b3bec2b6eaf7441792e10982e566bd6e
work_keys_str_mv AT cesardlopezbs artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT anastasiagazgalisbs artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT venkatboddapatimd artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT roshanpshahmd artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT hjohncoopermd artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT jeffreyagellermd artificiallearningandmachinelearningdecisionguidanceapplicationsintotalhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
_version_ 1718429979850571776