Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guido Contreras-Díaz, Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos, Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos, Leonardo Intelangelo, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga, Darío Martinez-Garcia
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
hip
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd42021-11-11T16:28:02ZReliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.3390/ijerph1821113261660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11326https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Hip flexion shows moderate reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.46–0.99) and good reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54–1.04). Hip extension shows excellent reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and moderate reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96). Flexion of 120°/s and 180°/s showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85–1.00), (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.01). The 60°/s and 120°/s extension showed good reliability (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99). The 180°/s extension presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusions: The standing position shows good reliability for hip flexion and the supine position shows excellent reliability for hip extension, both movements have excellent reliability at velocities between 120°/s to 180°/s.Guido Contreras-DíazLuis Javier Chirosa-RíosIgnacio Chirosa-RíosLeonardo IntelangeloDaniel Jerez-MayorgaDarío Martinez-GarciaMDPI AGarticlereliabilityreproducibilityhipisokineticmuscle strengthMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11326, p 11326 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic reliability
reproducibility
hip
isokinetic
muscle strength
Medicine
R
spellingShingle reliability
reproducibility
hip
isokinetic
muscle strength
Medicine
R
Guido Contreras-Díaz
Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos
Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos
Leonardo Intelangelo
Daniel Jerez-Mayorga
Darío Martinez-Garcia
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
description Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Hip flexion shows moderate reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.46–0.99) and good reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54–1.04). Hip extension shows excellent reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and moderate reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96). Flexion of 120°/s and 180°/s showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85–1.00), (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.01). The 60°/s and 120°/s extension showed good reliability (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99). The 180°/s extension presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusions: The standing position shows good reliability for hip flexion and the supine position shows excellent reliability for hip extension, both movements have excellent reliability at velocities between 120°/s to 180°/s.
format article
author Guido Contreras-Díaz
Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos
Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos
Leonardo Intelangelo
Daniel Jerez-Mayorga
Darío Martinez-Garcia
author_facet Guido Contreras-Díaz
Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos
Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos
Leonardo Intelangelo
Daniel Jerez-Mayorga
Darío Martinez-Garcia
author_sort Guido Contreras-Díaz
title Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort reliability of isokinetic hip flexor and extensor strength measurements in healthy subjects and athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4
work_keys_str_mv AT guidocontrerasdiaz reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luisjavierchirosarios reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ignaciochirosarios reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leonardointelangelo reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT danieljerezmayorga reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dariomartinezgarcia reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718432318198120448