Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all s...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd42021-11-11T16:28:02ZReliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.3390/ijerph1821113261660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11326https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Hip flexion shows moderate reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.46–0.99) and good reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54–1.04). Hip extension shows excellent reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and moderate reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96). Flexion of 120°/s and 180°/s showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85–1.00), (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.01). The 60°/s and 120°/s extension showed good reliability (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99). The 180°/s extension presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusions: The standing position shows good reliability for hip flexion and the supine position shows excellent reliability for hip extension, both movements have excellent reliability at velocities between 120°/s to 180°/s.Guido Contreras-DíazLuis Javier Chirosa-RíosIgnacio Chirosa-RíosLeonardo IntelangeloDaniel Jerez-MayorgaDarío Martinez-GarciaMDPI AGarticlereliabilityreproducibilityhipisokineticmuscle strengthMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11326, p 11326 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
reliability reproducibility hip isokinetic muscle strength Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
reliability reproducibility hip isokinetic muscle strength Medicine R Guido Contreras-Díaz Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos Leonardo Intelangelo Daniel Jerez-Mayorga Darío Martinez-Garcia Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
description |
Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Hip flexion shows moderate reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.46–0.99) and good reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54–1.04). Hip extension shows excellent reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and moderate reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96). Flexion of 120°/s and 180°/s showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85–1.00), (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.01). The 60°/s and 120°/s extension showed good reliability (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99). The 180°/s extension presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusions: The standing position shows good reliability for hip flexion and the supine position shows excellent reliability for hip extension, both movements have excellent reliability at velocities between 120°/s to 180°/s. |
format |
article |
author |
Guido Contreras-Díaz Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos Leonardo Intelangelo Daniel Jerez-Mayorga Darío Martinez-Garcia |
author_facet |
Guido Contreras-Díaz Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos Leonardo Intelangelo Daniel Jerez-Mayorga Darío Martinez-Garcia |
author_sort |
Guido Contreras-Díaz |
title |
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
reliability of isokinetic hip flexor and extensor strength measurements in healthy subjects and athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/b403f122968f45b5936849cca03a1bd4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guidocontrerasdiaz reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luisjavierchirosarios reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ignaciochirosarios reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leonardointelangelo reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT danieljerezmayorga reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dariomartinezgarcia reliabilityofisokinetichipflexorandextensorstrengthmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsandathletesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718432318198120448 |