Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand

Decision making in complex contexts such as disaster risk management requires collaborative approaches to knowledge production. Evidence-based disaster risk management and pre-event planning relies on robust and relevant disaster risk knowledge. We report on a case study of Project AF8, a "cocr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyler M. Barton, Sarah J. Beaven, Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry, Thomas M. Wilson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b416ff73a4b94227a35e4c460b2bda1a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b416ff73a4b94227a35e4c460b2bda1a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b416ff73a4b94227a35e4c460b2bda1a2021-12-02T14:37:54ZKnowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand1708-308710.5751/ES-11928-250425https://doaj.org/article/b416ff73a4b94227a35e4c460b2bda1a2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss4/art25/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Decision making in complex contexts such as disaster risk management requires collaborative approaches to knowledge production. Evidence-based disaster risk management and pre-event planning relies on robust and relevant disaster risk knowledge. We report on a case study of Project AF8, a "cocreation" collaboration involving local- and central-government disaster risk management agencies and groups, critical infrastructure organizations, and scientists from six universities and Crown Research Institutes. Participant observation and interview data are used to document and analyze the processes used to generate, share, and apply multidisciplinary disaster risk knowledge. Project AF8 was conceived as a cross-jurisdictional and multiagency initiative to plan and prepare for a coordinated response across the South Island following a large magnitude earthquake along the Alpine Fault, one of New Zealand's major natural hazard risks. Findings show that (1) practitioners at all levels operate in highly uncertain environments and therefore have specific knowledge needs at different times and for different purposes, (2) disaster risk knowledge was perceived to be most effective when scientifically credible and focused on identifying likely impacts on the capacity of communities to function, and (3) disaster risk knowledge outputs and the processes used to cocreate them were perceived to be equally important. Using cocreation to combine researcher credibility with practitioner relevancy enhanced the legitimacy of Project AF8 processes, the collective disaster risk knowledge they facilitated, and the wider project. In hindsight, a greater focus at the outset on developing a formal coproduction structure may have increased the pace of cocreation, particularly in the early phases. Future interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives could benefit by adopting contextually relevant aspects of this example to strengthen the science-practice interface for more effective pre-event planning and decision making.Tyler M. BartonSarah J. BeavenNicholas A. Cradock-HenryThomas M. WilsonResilience Alliancearticlecoproduction of knowledgedisaster impactsdisaster risk managementhazard researchinterdisciplinaryscience-practice interfaceBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 25, Iss 4, p 25 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic coproduction of knowledge
disaster impacts
disaster risk management
hazard research
interdisciplinary
science-practice interface
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle coproduction of knowledge
disaster impacts
disaster risk management
hazard research
interdisciplinary
science-practice interface
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Tyler M. Barton
Sarah J. Beaven
Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry
Thomas M. Wilson
Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
description Decision making in complex contexts such as disaster risk management requires collaborative approaches to knowledge production. Evidence-based disaster risk management and pre-event planning relies on robust and relevant disaster risk knowledge. We report on a case study of Project AF8, a "cocreation" collaboration involving local- and central-government disaster risk management agencies and groups, critical infrastructure organizations, and scientists from six universities and Crown Research Institutes. Participant observation and interview data are used to document and analyze the processes used to generate, share, and apply multidisciplinary disaster risk knowledge. Project AF8 was conceived as a cross-jurisdictional and multiagency initiative to plan and prepare for a coordinated response across the South Island following a large magnitude earthquake along the Alpine Fault, one of New Zealand's major natural hazard risks. Findings show that (1) practitioners at all levels operate in highly uncertain environments and therefore have specific knowledge needs at different times and for different purposes, (2) disaster risk knowledge was perceived to be most effective when scientifically credible and focused on identifying likely impacts on the capacity of communities to function, and (3) disaster risk knowledge outputs and the processes used to cocreate them were perceived to be equally important. Using cocreation to combine researcher credibility with practitioner relevancy enhanced the legitimacy of Project AF8 processes, the collective disaster risk knowledge they facilitated, and the wider project. In hindsight, a greater focus at the outset on developing a formal coproduction structure may have increased the pace of cocreation, particularly in the early phases. Future interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives could benefit by adopting contextually relevant aspects of this example to strengthen the science-practice interface for more effective pre-event planning and decision making.
format article
author Tyler M. Barton
Sarah J. Beaven
Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry
Thomas M. Wilson
author_facet Tyler M. Barton
Sarah J. Beaven
Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry
Thomas M. Wilson
author_sort Tyler M. Barton
title Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
title_short Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
title_full Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
title_fullStr Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from New Zealand
title_sort knowledge sharing in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation insights and experience from new zealand
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/b416ff73a4b94227a35e4c460b2bda1a
work_keys_str_mv AT tylermbarton knowledgesharingininterdisciplinarydisasterriskmanagementinitiativescocreationinsightsandexperiencefromnewzealand
AT sarahjbeaven knowledgesharingininterdisciplinarydisasterriskmanagementinitiativescocreationinsightsandexperiencefromnewzealand
AT nicholasacradockhenry knowledgesharingininterdisciplinarydisasterriskmanagementinitiativescocreationinsightsandexperiencefromnewzealand
AT thomasmwilson knowledgesharingininterdisciplinarydisasterriskmanagementinitiativescocreationinsightsandexperiencefromnewzealand
_version_ 1718390973236510720