Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development

Women leaders’ double bind arises from followers’ contradictory expectations that are rooted in the societal female gender role and the organizational leader role. Using qualitative data from alumnae of the Women’s Leadership Series (WLS) of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Rese...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gelaye Debebe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b4366258e1d745aeb043e7856c8833f3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b4366258e1d745aeb043e7856c8833f3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b4366258e1d745aeb043e7856c8833f32021-12-02T14:07:31ZNavigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development2331-197510.1080/23311975.2017.1313543https://doaj.org/article/b4366258e1d745aeb043e7856c8833f32017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1313543https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975Women leaders’ double bind arises from followers’ contradictory expectations that are rooted in the societal female gender role and the organizational leader role. Using qualitative data from alumnae of the Women’s Leadership Series (WLS) of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research, this paper examines whether and how formal training enables women to more effectively navigate this double bind. Findings show that the WLS fostered four types of leadership transformations: hidden to visible leadership, inflexible to receptive leadership, attenuated to expanded leadership, and discouraged to inspired leadership. Interpreting these transformations through the lens of three ideas from the leadership effectiveness literature—context, authenticity, and behavior—this paper proposes a grounded theory, dual contingency model of leadership effectiveness for women. The model suggests that effective leadership behavior accounts for the demands of context and authenticity and identifies four unique pathways through which inattention to either contingency arises and how imbalance is identified and balance is restored. By elucidating these four pathways, the model enriches the literature on leadership effectiveness and provides insights into how women may successfully navigate the double bind.Gelaye DebebeTaylor & Francis Grouparticleleadership effectivenesswomen’s leadershipdouble bindgendertrainingBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic leadership effectiveness
women’s leadership
double bind
gender
training
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle leadership effectiveness
women’s leadership
double bind
gender
training
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Gelaye Debebe
Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
description Women leaders’ double bind arises from followers’ contradictory expectations that are rooted in the societal female gender role and the organizational leader role. Using qualitative data from alumnae of the Women’s Leadership Series (WLS) of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research, this paper examines whether and how formal training enables women to more effectively navigate this double bind. Findings show that the WLS fostered four types of leadership transformations: hidden to visible leadership, inflexible to receptive leadership, attenuated to expanded leadership, and discouraged to inspired leadership. Interpreting these transformations through the lens of three ideas from the leadership effectiveness literature—context, authenticity, and behavior—this paper proposes a grounded theory, dual contingency model of leadership effectiveness for women. The model suggests that effective leadership behavior accounts for the demands of context and authenticity and identifies four unique pathways through which inattention to either contingency arises and how imbalance is identified and balance is restored. By elucidating these four pathways, the model enriches the literature on leadership effectiveness and provides insights into how women may successfully navigate the double bind.
format article
author Gelaye Debebe
author_facet Gelaye Debebe
author_sort Gelaye Debebe
title Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
title_short Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
title_full Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
title_fullStr Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
title_full_unstemmed Navigating the double bind: Transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
title_sort navigating the double bind: transformations to balance contextual responsiveness and authenticity in women’s leadership development
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/b4366258e1d745aeb043e7856c8833f3
work_keys_str_mv AT gelayedebebe navigatingthedoublebindtransformationstobalancecontextualresponsivenessandauthenticityinwomensleadershipdevelopment
_version_ 1718391984623714304