Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields
Historical annual maize yields in the U.S. are overestimated by CMIP5 models and underestimated by bias-corrected and downscaled models due to differences in temperature and precipitation hindcasts, according to a multi-model ensemble comparison.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | David C. Lafferty, Ryan L. Sriver, Iman Haqiqi, Thomas W. Hertel, Klaus Keller, Robert E. Nicholas |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/b44eae854a2a40f7af7844b31b055a33 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Is time a variable like the others in multivariate statistical downscaling and bias correction?
by: Y. Robin, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Impacts of compound hot–dry extremes on US soybean yields
by: R. Hamed, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Conservation agriculture increases the soil resilience and cotton yield stability in climate extremes of the southeast US
by: Amin Nouri, et al.
Published: (2021) -
How biased are our models? – a case study of the alpine region
by: D. Degen, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Projections of northern hemisphere extratropical climate underestimate internal variability and associated uncertainty
by: Christopher H. O’Reilly, et al.
Published: (2021)