Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence

Abstract This study evaluated if iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) prolongs time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of patients in high risk of locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. 116 patients with total tumor necrosis after RFA w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jian-Fei Tu, Ya-Hui Ding, Li Chen, Xi-Hui Ying, Deng-Ke Zhang, Fa-Zong Wu, Zhong-Wei Zhao, Jian-Song Ji, Wang-Gang Zhang, Hai Zou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b4b0f42caab1422991ab01580082beb5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b4b0f42caab1422991ab01580082beb5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b4b0f42caab1422991ab01580082beb52021-12-02T16:06:15ZIodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence10.1038/s41598-017-03831-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b4b0f42caab1422991ab01580082beb52017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03831-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study evaluated if iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) prolongs time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of patients in high risk of locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. 116 patients with total tumor necrosis after RFA were divided into iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis treatment group and control group. The primary endpoint was TTR, and secondary endpoints were OS and treatment-related adverse events. There were no significant differences among the baseline characteristics of two subgroups patients. The mean iodine-125 particles were 29.8 (26.59 ± 12.51 mCi) per patient. The mean follow-up was 25 months, and mean TTR of treatment and control groups were 21.7 and 15.9 months (P = 0.733); mean OS of two subgroups were 41.7 and 40.9 months (P = 0.316). There were no significant differences of 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-years TTR and OS and patients’ immunity pre- and 1 month post-treatment. Extrahepatic metastasis was found to have a statistically significant influence on TTR, and AFP, extrahepatic metastasis were found to have a statistically significant influence on OS by multivariate analysis. There was no major complications and procedure related death. Iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after RFA can’t improve TTR and OS of HCC patients who were in high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence.Jian-Fei TuYa-Hui DingLi ChenXi-Hui YingDeng-Ke ZhangFa-Zong WuZhong-Wei ZhaoJian-Song JiWang-Gang ZhangHai ZouNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jian-Fei Tu
Ya-Hui Ding
Li Chen
Xi-Hui Ying
Deng-Ke Zhang
Fa-Zong Wu
Zhong-Wei Zhao
Jian-Song Ji
Wang-Gang Zhang
Hai Zou
Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
description Abstract This study evaluated if iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) prolongs time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of patients in high risk of locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. 116 patients with total tumor necrosis after RFA were divided into iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis treatment group and control group. The primary endpoint was TTR, and secondary endpoints were OS and treatment-related adverse events. There were no significant differences among the baseline characteristics of two subgroups patients. The mean iodine-125 particles were 29.8 (26.59 ± 12.51 mCi) per patient. The mean follow-up was 25 months, and mean TTR of treatment and control groups were 21.7 and 15.9 months (P = 0.733); mean OS of two subgroups were 41.7 and 40.9 months (P = 0.316). There were no significant differences of 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-years TTR and OS and patients’ immunity pre- and 1 month post-treatment. Extrahepatic metastasis was found to have a statistically significant influence on TTR, and AFP, extrahepatic metastasis were found to have a statistically significant influence on OS by multivariate analysis. There was no major complications and procedure related death. Iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after RFA can’t improve TTR and OS of HCC patients who were in high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence.
format article
author Jian-Fei Tu
Ya-Hui Ding
Li Chen
Xi-Hui Ying
Deng-Ke Zhang
Fa-Zong Wu
Zhong-Wei Zhao
Jian-Song Ji
Wang-Gang Zhang
Hai Zou
author_facet Jian-Fei Tu
Ya-Hui Ding
Li Chen
Xi-Hui Ying
Deng-Ke Zhang
Fa-Zong Wu
Zhong-Wei Zhao
Jian-Song Ji
Wang-Gang Zhang
Hai Zou
author_sort Jian-Fei Tu
title Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
title_short Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
title_full Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
title_fullStr Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
title_full_unstemmed Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Prophylaxis after Radiofrequency Ablation Cannot Benefit Patients in High Risk of Locoregional Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
title_sort iodine-125 brachytherapy prophylaxis after radiofrequency ablation cannot benefit patients in high risk of locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/b4b0f42caab1422991ab01580082beb5
work_keys_str_mv AT jianfeitu iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT yahuiding iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT lichen iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT xihuiying iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT dengkezhang iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT fazongwu iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT zhongweizhao iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT jiansongji iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT wanggangzhang iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
AT haizou iodine125brachytherapyprophylaxisafterradiofrequencyablationcannotbenefitpatientsinhighriskoflocoregionalhepatocellularcarcinomarecurrence
_version_ 1718385047710466048