The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.

Existing research shows that evaluations of the risks and benefits of various hazards (i.e., technologies and activities) are inversely related. The affect heuristic explains the negative relation between risks and benefits, as based on the strength of positive or negative affect associated with a h...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patrycja Sleboda, Carl Johan Lagerkvist
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b4ec03dd0aee41d6a50ba930c5ffa2a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b4ec03dd0aee41d6a50ba930c5ffa2a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b4ec03dd0aee41d6a50ba930c5ffa2a42021-12-02T20:18:31ZThe inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0255569https://doaj.org/article/b4ec03dd0aee41d6a50ba930c5ffa2a42021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255569https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Existing research shows that evaluations of the risks and benefits of various hazards (i.e., technologies and activities) are inversely related. The affect heuristic explains the negative relation between risks and benefits, as based on the strength of positive or negative affect associated with a hazard. Research on the affect heuristic previously investigated under which conditions people judge risk and benefits independently, focusing on expertise as a factor that might exempt from inversely related judgements of risk and benefits. Measurements within Dual Process Theories have been found to be associated with rational, analytical decision making and accurate judgments. In this paper we investigated the extent to which rational information processing styles can predict the risk-benefit relation of technologies in a medical and food applications and whether the attitudes influence the strength or direction of the relationship. Using the Need for Cognition Scale (NFC), a psychometric-based risk scale and an explicit measure of attitude, in a representative sample of 3228 Swedes, we found that the high NFC group judged the risks and benefits of technologies to be inversely related. In contrast, the low NFC group judged the risks and benefits to be positively related. These results were confirmed across all studied technologies by applying moderation analysis. We discuss the results in light of recent research on cognitive processing and polarization over technologies' risks.Patrycja SlebodaCarl Johan LagerkvistPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0255569 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Patrycja Sleboda
Carl Johan Lagerkvist
The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
description Existing research shows that evaluations of the risks and benefits of various hazards (i.e., technologies and activities) are inversely related. The affect heuristic explains the negative relation between risks and benefits, as based on the strength of positive or negative affect associated with a hazard. Research on the affect heuristic previously investigated under which conditions people judge risk and benefits independently, focusing on expertise as a factor that might exempt from inversely related judgements of risk and benefits. Measurements within Dual Process Theories have been found to be associated with rational, analytical decision making and accurate judgments. In this paper we investigated the extent to which rational information processing styles can predict the risk-benefit relation of technologies in a medical and food applications and whether the attitudes influence the strength or direction of the relationship. Using the Need for Cognition Scale (NFC), a psychometric-based risk scale and an explicit measure of attitude, in a representative sample of 3228 Swedes, we found that the high NFC group judged the risks and benefits of technologies to be inversely related. In contrast, the low NFC group judged the risks and benefits to be positively related. These results were confirmed across all studied technologies by applying moderation analysis. We discuss the results in light of recent research on cognitive processing and polarization over technologies' risks.
format article
author Patrycja Sleboda
Carl Johan Lagerkvist
author_facet Patrycja Sleboda
Carl Johan Lagerkvist
author_sort Patrycja Sleboda
title The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
title_short The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
title_full The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
title_fullStr The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
title_full_unstemmed The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
title_sort inverse relation between risks and benefits: the impact of individual differences in information processing style.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b4ec03dd0aee41d6a50ba930c5ffa2a4
work_keys_str_mv AT patrycjasleboda theinverserelationbetweenrisksandbenefitstheimpactofindividualdifferencesininformationprocessingstyle
AT carljohanlagerkvist theinverserelationbetweenrisksandbenefitstheimpactofindividualdifferencesininformationprocessingstyle
AT patrycjasleboda inverserelationbetweenrisksandbenefitstheimpactofindividualdifferencesininformationprocessingstyle
AT carljohanlagerkvist inverserelationbetweenrisksandbenefitstheimpactofindividualdifferencesininformationprocessingstyle
_version_ 1718374305716240384