New Historicism: Text and Context

During most of the twentieth century history was seen as a phenomenon outside of literature that guaranteed the veracity of literary interpretation. History was unique and it functioned as a basis for reading literary works. During the seventies of the twentieth century there occurred a change of at...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Violeta M. Vesić
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b5139084ce014294bfb9f9a5df6bfac4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b5139084ce014294bfb9f9a5df6bfac4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b5139084ce014294bfb9f9a5df6bfac42021-12-02T04:04:41ZNew Historicism: Text and Context0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/b5139084ce014294bfb9f9a5df6bfac42016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/12https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801During most of the twentieth century history was seen as a phenomenon outside of literature that guaranteed the veracity of literary interpretation. History was unique and it functioned as a basis for reading literary works. During the seventies of the twentieth century there occurred a change of attitude towards history in American literary theory, and there appeared a new theoretical approach which soon became known as New Historicism. Since its inception, New Historicism has been identified with the study of Renaissance and Romanticism, but nowadays it has been increasingly involved in other literary trends. Although there are great differences in the arguments and practices at various representatives of this school, New Historicism has clearly recognizable features and many new historicists will agree with the statement of Walter Cohen that New Historicism, when it appeared in the eighties, represented something quite new in reference to the studies of theory, criticism and history (Cohen 1987, 33). Theoretical connection with Bakhtin, Foucault and Marx is clear, as well as a kind of uneasy tie with deconstruction and the work of Paul de Man. At the center of this approach is a renewed interest in the study of literary works in the light of historical and political circumstances in which they were created. Foucault encouraged readers to begin to move literary texts and to link them with discourses and representations that are not literary, as well as to examine the sociological aspects of the texts in order to take part in the social struggles of today. The study of literary works using New Historicism is the study of politics, history, culture and circumstances in which these works were created. With regard to one of the main fact which is located in the center of the criticism, that history cannot be viewed objectively and that reality can only be understood through a cultural context that reveals the work, re-reading and interpretation of literature is not just re-reading of texts that are already well known, but reading in a completely new way.Violeta M. VesićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 187-207 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Violeta M. Vesić
New Historicism: Text and Context
description During most of the twentieth century history was seen as a phenomenon outside of literature that guaranteed the veracity of literary interpretation. History was unique and it functioned as a basis for reading literary works. During the seventies of the twentieth century there occurred a change of attitude towards history in American literary theory, and there appeared a new theoretical approach which soon became known as New Historicism. Since its inception, New Historicism has been identified with the study of Renaissance and Romanticism, but nowadays it has been increasingly involved in other literary trends. Although there are great differences in the arguments and practices at various representatives of this school, New Historicism has clearly recognizable features and many new historicists will agree with the statement of Walter Cohen that New Historicism, when it appeared in the eighties, represented something quite new in reference to the studies of theory, criticism and history (Cohen 1987, 33). Theoretical connection with Bakhtin, Foucault and Marx is clear, as well as a kind of uneasy tie with deconstruction and the work of Paul de Man. At the center of this approach is a renewed interest in the study of literary works in the light of historical and political circumstances in which they were created. Foucault encouraged readers to begin to move literary texts and to link them with discourses and representations that are not literary, as well as to examine the sociological aspects of the texts in order to take part in the social struggles of today. The study of literary works using New Historicism is the study of politics, history, culture and circumstances in which these works were created. With regard to one of the main fact which is located in the center of the criticism, that history cannot be viewed objectively and that reality can only be understood through a cultural context that reveals the work, re-reading and interpretation of literature is not just re-reading of texts that are already well known, but reading in a completely new way.
format article
author Violeta M. Vesić
author_facet Violeta M. Vesić
author_sort Violeta M. Vesić
title New Historicism: Text and Context
title_short New Historicism: Text and Context
title_full New Historicism: Text and Context
title_fullStr New Historicism: Text and Context
title_full_unstemmed New Historicism: Text and Context
title_sort new historicism: text and context
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/b5139084ce014294bfb9f9a5df6bfac4
work_keys_str_mv AT violetamvesic newhistoricismtextandcontext
_version_ 1718401454245412864