Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is expressed in high numbers in a variety of human tumors, including the frequently occurring prostate and breast cancers, and therefore provides the rationale for directing diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclides on cancer lesions after administration o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosalba Mansi, Berthold A. Nock, Simone U. Dalm, Martijn B. Busstra, Wytske M. van Weerden, Theodosia Maina
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b5307ffe34c94955b6238c35c393b099
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b5307ffe34c94955b6238c35c393b099
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b5307ffe34c94955b6238c35c393b0992021-11-25T17:03:45ZRadiolabeled Bombesin Analogs10.3390/cancers132257662072-6694https://doaj.org/article/b5307ffe34c94955b6238c35c393b0992021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/22/5766https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is expressed in high numbers in a variety of human tumors, including the frequently occurring prostate and breast cancers, and therefore provides the rationale for directing diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclides on cancer lesions after administration of anti-GRPR peptide analogs. This concept has been initially explored with analogs of the frog 14-peptide bombesin, suitably modified at the N-terminus with a number of radiometal chelates. Radiotracers that were selected for clinical testing revealed inherent problems associated with these GRPR agonists, related to low metabolic stability, unfavorable abdominal accumulation, and adverse effects. A shift toward GRPR antagonists soon followed, with safer analogs becoming available, whereby, metabolic stability and background clearance issues were gradually improved. Clinical testing of three main major antagonist types led to promising outcomes, but at the same time brought to light several limitations of this concept, partly related to the variation of GRPR expression levels across cancer types, stages, previous treatments, and other factors. Currently, these parameters are being rigorously addressed by cell biologists, chemists, nuclear medicine physicians, and other discipline practitioners in a common effort to make available more effective and safe state-of-the-art molecular tools to combat GRPR-positive tumors. In the present review, we present the background, current status, and future perspectives of this endeavor.Rosalba MansiBerthold A. NockSimone U. DalmMartijn B. BusstraWytske M. van WeerdenTheodosia MainaMDPI AGarticlegastrin-releasing peptide receptorradiolabeled bombesincancer theranosticsNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancers, Vol 13, Iss 5766, p 5766 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gastrin-releasing peptide receptor
radiolabeled bombesin
cancer theranostics
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle gastrin-releasing peptide receptor
radiolabeled bombesin
cancer theranostics
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Rosalba Mansi
Berthold A. Nock
Simone U. Dalm
Martijn B. Busstra
Wytske M. van Weerden
Theodosia Maina
Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
description The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is expressed in high numbers in a variety of human tumors, including the frequently occurring prostate and breast cancers, and therefore provides the rationale for directing diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclides on cancer lesions after administration of anti-GRPR peptide analogs. This concept has been initially explored with analogs of the frog 14-peptide bombesin, suitably modified at the N-terminus with a number of radiometal chelates. Radiotracers that were selected for clinical testing revealed inherent problems associated with these GRPR agonists, related to low metabolic stability, unfavorable abdominal accumulation, and adverse effects. A shift toward GRPR antagonists soon followed, with safer analogs becoming available, whereby, metabolic stability and background clearance issues were gradually improved. Clinical testing of three main major antagonist types led to promising outcomes, but at the same time brought to light several limitations of this concept, partly related to the variation of GRPR expression levels across cancer types, stages, previous treatments, and other factors. Currently, these parameters are being rigorously addressed by cell biologists, chemists, nuclear medicine physicians, and other discipline practitioners in a common effort to make available more effective and safe state-of-the-art molecular tools to combat GRPR-positive tumors. In the present review, we present the background, current status, and future perspectives of this endeavor.
format article
author Rosalba Mansi
Berthold A. Nock
Simone U. Dalm
Martijn B. Busstra
Wytske M. van Weerden
Theodosia Maina
author_facet Rosalba Mansi
Berthold A. Nock
Simone U. Dalm
Martijn B. Busstra
Wytske M. van Weerden
Theodosia Maina
author_sort Rosalba Mansi
title Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
title_short Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
title_full Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
title_fullStr Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
title_full_unstemmed Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs
title_sort radiolabeled bombesin analogs
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b5307ffe34c94955b6238c35c393b099
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalbamansi radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
AT bertholdanock radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
AT simoneudalm radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
AT martijnbbusstra radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
AT wytskemvanweerden radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
AT theodosiamaina radiolabeledbombesinanalogs
_version_ 1718412797662986240