Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire

The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ann Bowling, Gene Rowe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Beryl Institute 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec02021-11-15T03:34:04ZPsychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire2372-0247https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec02014-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pxjournal.org/journal/vol1/iss1/16https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and Realistic expectations, and Post-visit Experiences (met expectations), based on literature review, semi-structured interviews, and subsequently piloted and refined. Patients completed the questionnaire about their ideal and realistic expectations before they saw the doctor, and were asked if their expectations had been met afterwards. The results show the scales met acceptability criteria for reliability (Cronbach’s alphas exceeded α 0.70), administration mode (interview and self-completion), and sample type (general practice and hospital). Split-half reliability was also acceptable. Adjusted odds ratios showed that post-visit experiences (met expectations), followed by feelings of control in life, and age, were the most powerful independent predictors of overall patient satisfaction ratings with the clinic visit, and independent self-ratings of whether their expectations had been met overall. This leads the authors to conclude that the PEQ as a self-report instrument, has good reliability and validity and covers the main types of patient expectations of ambulatory health care. It has policy potential for monitoring expectation management, and is thus of potential benefit to providers and purchasers of health services, and ultimately to patients.Ann BowlingGene RoweThe Beryl Institutearticlequality indicatorspatient expectationspatient satisfactionpsychometricsmeasurementquestionnairescale developmentMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPatient Experience Journal, Vol 1, Iss 1 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic quality indicators
patient expectations
patient satisfaction
psychometrics
measurement
questionnaire
scale development
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle quality indicators
patient expectations
patient satisfaction
psychometrics
measurement
questionnaire
scale development
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Ann Bowling
Gene Rowe
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
description The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and Realistic expectations, and Post-visit Experiences (met expectations), based on literature review, semi-structured interviews, and subsequently piloted and refined. Patients completed the questionnaire about their ideal and realistic expectations before they saw the doctor, and were asked if their expectations had been met afterwards. The results show the scales met acceptability criteria for reliability (Cronbach’s alphas exceeded α 0.70), administration mode (interview and self-completion), and sample type (general practice and hospital). Split-half reliability was also acceptable. Adjusted odds ratios showed that post-visit experiences (met expectations), followed by feelings of control in life, and age, were the most powerful independent predictors of overall patient satisfaction ratings with the clinic visit, and independent self-ratings of whether their expectations had been met overall. This leads the authors to conclude that the PEQ as a self-report instrument, has good reliability and validity and covers the main types of patient expectations of ambulatory health care. It has policy potential for monitoring expectation management, and is thus of potential benefit to providers and purchasers of health services, and ultimately to patients.
format article
author Ann Bowling
Gene Rowe
author_facet Ann Bowling
Gene Rowe
author_sort Ann Bowling
title Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
title_short Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
title_full Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
title_sort psychometric properties of the new patients’ expectations questionnaire
publisher The Beryl Institute
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0
work_keys_str_mv AT annbowling psychometricpropertiesofthenewpatientsexpectationsquestionnaire
AT generowe psychometricpropertiesofthenewpatientsexpectationsquestionnaire
_version_ 1718428891447558144