Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire
The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
The Beryl Institute
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec02021-11-15T03:34:04ZPsychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire2372-0247https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec02014-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pxjournal.org/journal/vol1/iss1/16https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and Realistic expectations, and Post-visit Experiences (met expectations), based on literature review, semi-structured interviews, and subsequently piloted and refined. Patients completed the questionnaire about their ideal and realistic expectations before they saw the doctor, and were asked if their expectations had been met afterwards. The results show the scales met acceptability criteria for reliability (Cronbach’s alphas exceeded α 0.70), administration mode (interview and self-completion), and sample type (general practice and hospital). Split-half reliability was also acceptable. Adjusted odds ratios showed that post-visit experiences (met expectations), followed by feelings of control in life, and age, were the most powerful independent predictors of overall patient satisfaction ratings with the clinic visit, and independent self-ratings of whether their expectations had been met overall. This leads the authors to conclude that the PEQ as a self-report instrument, has good reliability and validity and covers the main types of patient expectations of ambulatory health care. It has policy potential for monitoring expectation management, and is thus of potential benefit to providers and purchasers of health services, and ultimately to patients.Ann BowlingGene RoweThe Beryl Institutearticlequality indicatorspatient expectationspatient satisfactionpsychometricsmeasurementquestionnairescale developmentMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPatient Experience Journal, Vol 1, Iss 1 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
quality indicators patient expectations patient satisfaction psychometrics measurement questionnaire scale development Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
quality indicators patient expectations patient satisfaction psychometrics measurement questionnaire scale development Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Ann Bowling Gene Rowe Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
description |
The authors explore the development of the Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire (PEQ) and examination of psychometric characteristics it encompasses by reviewing surveys of primary care and hospital outpatients before and after their clinic visit. Three scales were developed for Pre-visit Ideal and Realistic expectations, and Post-visit Experiences (met expectations), based on literature review, semi-structured interviews, and subsequently piloted and refined. Patients completed the questionnaire about their ideal and realistic expectations before they saw the doctor, and were asked if their expectations had been met afterwards. The results show the scales met acceptability criteria for reliability (Cronbach’s alphas exceeded α 0.70), administration mode (interview and self-completion), and sample type (general practice and hospital). Split-half reliability was also acceptable. Adjusted odds ratios showed that post-visit experiences (met expectations), followed by feelings of control in life, and age, were the most powerful independent predictors of overall patient satisfaction ratings with the clinic visit, and independent self-ratings of whether their expectations had been met overall. This leads the authors to conclude that the PEQ as a self-report instrument, has good reliability and validity and covers the main types of patient expectations of ambulatory health care. It has policy potential for monitoring expectation management, and is thus of potential benefit to providers and purchasers of health services, and ultimately to patients. |
format |
article |
author |
Ann Bowling Gene Rowe |
author_facet |
Ann Bowling Gene Rowe |
author_sort |
Ann Bowling |
title |
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
title_short |
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
title_full |
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
title_fullStr |
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychometric properties of the new Patients’ Expectations Questionnaire |
title_sort |
psychometric properties of the new patients’ expectations questionnaire |
publisher |
The Beryl Institute |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/b5db0ddcabfc443a9d2e5d74c95c4ec0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annbowling psychometricpropertiesofthenewpatientsexpectationsquestionnaire AT generowe psychometricpropertiesofthenewpatientsexpectationsquestionnaire |
_version_ |
1718428891447558144 |