Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?

The brain's ability to synchronize movements with external cues is used daily, yet neuroscience is far from a full understanding of the brain mechanisms that facilitate and set behavioral limits on these sequential performances. This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was design...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhim M Adhikari, Kristen M Quinn, Mukesh Dhamala
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b6372646c1fb42e19a17e7c0a2517009
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b6372646c1fb42e19a17e7c0a2517009
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b6372646c1fb42e19a17e7c0a25170092021-11-18T08:50:09ZIs the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0078055https://doaj.org/article/b6372646c1fb42e19a17e7c0a25170092013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24205088/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The brain's ability to synchronize movements with external cues is used daily, yet neuroscience is far from a full understanding of the brain mechanisms that facilitate and set behavioral limits on these sequential performances. This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was designed to help understand the neural basis of behavioral performance differences on a synchronizing movement task during increasing (acceleration) and decreasing (deceleration) metronome rates. In the MRI scanner, subjects were instructed to tap their right index finger on a response box in synchrony to visual cues presented on a display screen. The tapping rate varied either continuously or in discrete steps ranging from 0.5 Hz to 3 Hz. Subjects were able to synchronize better during continuously accelerating rhythms than in continuously or discretely decelerating rhythms. The fMRI data revealed that the precuneus was activated more during continuous deceleration than during acceleration with the hysteresis effect significant at rhythm rates above 1 Hz. From the behavioral data, two performance measures, tapping rate and synchrony index, were derived to further analyze the relative brain activity during acceleration and deceleration of rhythms. Tapping rate was associated with a greater brain activity during deceleration in the cerebellum, superior temporal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus. Synchrony index was associated with a greater activity during the continuous acceleration phase than during the continuous deceleration or discrete acceleration phases in a distributed network of regions including the prefrontal cortex and precuneus. These results indicate that the brain's inertia for movement is different for acceleration and deceleration, which may have implications in understanding the origin of our perceptual and behavioral limits.Bhim M AdhikariKristen M QuinnMukesh DhamalaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 10, p e78055 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Bhim M Adhikari
Kristen M Quinn
Mukesh Dhamala
Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
description The brain's ability to synchronize movements with external cues is used daily, yet neuroscience is far from a full understanding of the brain mechanisms that facilitate and set behavioral limits on these sequential performances. This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was designed to help understand the neural basis of behavioral performance differences on a synchronizing movement task during increasing (acceleration) and decreasing (deceleration) metronome rates. In the MRI scanner, subjects were instructed to tap their right index finger on a response box in synchrony to visual cues presented on a display screen. The tapping rate varied either continuously or in discrete steps ranging from 0.5 Hz to 3 Hz. Subjects were able to synchronize better during continuously accelerating rhythms than in continuously or discretely decelerating rhythms. The fMRI data revealed that the precuneus was activated more during continuous deceleration than during acceleration with the hysteresis effect significant at rhythm rates above 1 Hz. From the behavioral data, two performance measures, tapping rate and synchrony index, were derived to further analyze the relative brain activity during acceleration and deceleration of rhythms. Tapping rate was associated with a greater brain activity during deceleration in the cerebellum, superior temporal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus. Synchrony index was associated with a greater activity during the continuous acceleration phase than during the continuous deceleration or discrete acceleration phases in a distributed network of regions including the prefrontal cortex and precuneus. These results indicate that the brain's inertia for movement is different for acceleration and deceleration, which may have implications in understanding the origin of our perceptual and behavioral limits.
format article
author Bhim M Adhikari
Kristen M Quinn
Mukesh Dhamala
author_facet Bhim M Adhikari
Kristen M Quinn
Mukesh Dhamala
author_sort Bhim M Adhikari
title Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
title_short Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
title_full Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
title_fullStr Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
title_full_unstemmed Is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
title_sort is the brain's inertia for motor movements different for acceleration and deceleration?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/b6372646c1fb42e19a17e7c0a2517009
work_keys_str_mv AT bhimmadhikari isthebrainsinertiaformotormovementsdifferentforaccelerationanddeceleration
AT kristenmquinn isthebrainsinertiaformotormovementsdifferentforaccelerationanddeceleration
AT mukeshdhamala isthebrainsinertiaformotormovementsdifferentforaccelerationanddeceleration
_version_ 1718421283365978112