Cost-Aware Design and Fabrication of New Support Structures in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Microstructure and Metallurgical Properties

This study investigates the effect of support structures on the properties of Inconel 718 (i.e., IN718) parts produced by the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. Specifically, the effects of support structure shape (i.e., pin-type, angled-type, cone-type) and geometry (i.e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bharath Bhushan Ravichander, Sourabh Thakare, Aditya Ganesh-Ram, Behzad Farhang, Manjunath Hanumantha, Yiran Yang, Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam, Amirhesam Amerinatanzi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b647d1ab0e884751ac2156f6668f3945
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:This study investigates the effect of support structures on the properties of Inconel 718 (i.e., IN718) parts produced by the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. Specifically, the effects of support structure shape (i.e., pin-type, angled-type, cone-type) and geometry (i.e., support wall thickness, and gap) on their composition, hardness, microstructure, and material/time consumption are investigated and compared to the conventionally fabricated Inconel 718. From the microstructural analysis, the deepest melt pools appeared to be formed in the sample fabricated on top of the pin-type support structure having a relatively low wall thickness. The XRD results conveyed that a proper selection of geometrical variables for designing support structure results in elevated levels of the strengthening phases of IN718. The sample fabricated on top of the pin-type support structure showed the highest Vickers hardness value of 460.5 HV, which was even higher than what was reported for the heat-treated wrought Inconel 718 (355–385 HV). Moreover, for the thinner support wall thickness, an improvement in the hardness value of the fabricated samples was observed. This study urges a reconsideration of the common approach of selecting supports for additive manufacturing of samples when a higher quality of the as-fabricated parts is desired.