Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran

This paper explores the reason behind the crisis of representation in post-revolutionary competing Iranian gender discourses. These competing discourses include Islamic fundamentalism, religious revisionism, and secular feminism. The crisis of representation is related to at least three main presupp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fatemeh Sadeghi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: Université de Provence 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b6eb9fa84a28411e872f83e93a00d148
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b6eb9fa84a28411e872f83e93a00d148
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b6eb9fa84a28411e872f83e93a00d1482021-12-02T10:06:18ZBypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran0997-13272105-227110.4000/remmm.6936https://doaj.org/article/b6eb9fa84a28411e872f83e93a00d1482010-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/remmm/6936https://doaj.org/toc/0997-1327https://doaj.org/toc/2105-2271This paper explores the reason behind the crisis of representation in post-revolutionary competing Iranian gender discourses. These competing discourses include Islamic fundamentalism, religious revisionism, and secular feminism. The crisis of representation is related to at least three main presuppositions and attendant action programs: first, discrimination against women and possible accommodations should be examined in the context of religious and legal institutions. This approach resulted in the depoliticization of women’s issues, even though most Iranian women have persistently proclaimed equality and citizenship through political participation. This was the case for the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the reform movement and most recently, the Green Movement following the 2009 presidential election. The second presupposition is that individual identity is a fundamental condition for socio-political activism. The third presupposition is that discrimination against women in post-revolutionary Iran is essentially a legalist strategy and has resulted in campaigns that failed to address women’s daily challenges. On the contrary, women’s political participation in post-revolutionary Iran shows that gender issues are always political issues and need to be understood politically and politicized. Such a notion challenges attitudes which relegate gender discrimination and social solutions to the purview of religion or secularism.Fatemeh SadeghiUniversité de ProvencearticleGreen MovementIslamic fundamentalismreform movementreligious revisionismsecular feminismHistory of AfricaDT1-3415Social sciences (General)H1-99ENFRRevue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée, Vol 128, Pp 209-228 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic Green Movement
Islamic fundamentalism
reform movement
religious revisionism
secular feminism
History of Africa
DT1-3415
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle Green Movement
Islamic fundamentalism
reform movement
religious revisionism
secular feminism
History of Africa
DT1-3415
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Fatemeh Sadeghi
Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
description This paper explores the reason behind the crisis of representation in post-revolutionary competing Iranian gender discourses. These competing discourses include Islamic fundamentalism, religious revisionism, and secular feminism. The crisis of representation is related to at least three main presuppositions and attendant action programs: first, discrimination against women and possible accommodations should be examined in the context of religious and legal institutions. This approach resulted in the depoliticization of women’s issues, even though most Iranian women have persistently proclaimed equality and citizenship through political participation. This was the case for the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the reform movement and most recently, the Green Movement following the 2009 presidential election. The second presupposition is that individual identity is a fundamental condition for socio-political activism. The third presupposition is that discrimination against women in post-revolutionary Iran is essentially a legalist strategy and has resulted in campaigns that failed to address women’s daily challenges. On the contrary, women’s political participation in post-revolutionary Iran shows that gender issues are always political issues and need to be understood politically and politicized. Such a notion challenges attitudes which relegate gender discrimination and social solutions to the purview of religion or secularism.
format article
author Fatemeh Sadeghi
author_facet Fatemeh Sadeghi
author_sort Fatemeh Sadeghi
title Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
title_short Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
title_full Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
title_fullStr Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
title_full_unstemmed Bypassing Islamism and Feminism: Women’s Resistance and Rebellion in Post-revolutionary Iran
title_sort bypassing islamism and feminism: women’s resistance and rebellion in post-revolutionary iran
publisher Université de Provence
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/b6eb9fa84a28411e872f83e93a00d148
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehsadeghi bypassingislamismandfeminismwomensresistanceandrebellioninpostrevolutionaryiran
_version_ 1718397649922555904