COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES

Objective: To compare the frequency of clinical failure of lingual retainers bonded with primerless flowable adhesives and conventional bonding adhesives. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry Rawalp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Faheem Nake Akhtar, Abdullah Jan, Sana Tariq, Mehwish Khan, Munazza Saeed
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021
Materias:	conventional bonding adhesives lingual retainer failure primer primerless flowable adhesives Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.3575 https://doaj.org/article/b72149a838ae4d2d8deb2918fd39c4b4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b72149a838ae4d2d8deb2918fd39c4b4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b72149a838ae4d2d8deb2918fd39c4b42021-12-02T16:45:50ZCOMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVEShttps://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.35750030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/b72149a838ae4d2d8deb2918fd39c4b42021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3575https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To compare the frequency of clinical failure of lingual retainers bonded with primerless flowable adhesives and conventional bonding adhesives. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry Rawalpindi, from Jul 2017 to Jun 2018. Methodology: As per selection criteria, 76 patients were selected by non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups: the conventional bonding adhesive and the primerless flowable adhesive group with 38 patients in each group. Retainers were bonded using standardized procedure with conventional bonding adhesive in one group and primerless flowable adhesive for bonding in the other group. After bonding of retainers, patients were recalled after 3 months and any bonding failures were recorded. Results: Failure rate with conventional bonding adhesive was 10.5% while on the other hand, failure with primerless flowable adhesive was 31.6% with a p-value of 0.047 which showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference of clinical failure rate of lingual retainers bonded with conventional bonding adhesive versus primerless flowable adhesive with greater failure rate of the primerless flowable adhesive.Faheem Nake AkhtarAbdullah JanSana TariqMehwish KhanMunazza SaeedArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticleconventional bonding adhesiveslingual retainer failureprimerprimerless flowable adhesivesMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 71, Iss 2, Pp 681-685 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	conventional bonding adhesives lingual retainer failure primer primerless flowable adhesives Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	conventional bonding adhesives lingual retainer failure primer primerless flowable adhesives Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Faheem Nake Akhtar Abdullah Jan Sana Tariq Mehwish Khan Munazza Saeed COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
description	Objective: To compare the frequency of clinical failure of lingual retainers bonded with primerless flowable adhesives and conventional bonding adhesives. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry Rawalpindi, from Jul 2017 to Jun 2018. Methodology: As per selection criteria, 76 patients were selected by non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups: the conventional bonding adhesive and the primerless flowable adhesive group with 38 patients in each group. Retainers were bonded using standardized procedure with conventional bonding adhesive in one group and primerless flowable adhesive for bonding in the other group. After bonding of retainers, patients were recalled after 3 months and any bonding failures were recorded. Results: Failure rate with conventional bonding adhesive was 10.5% while on the other hand, failure with primerless flowable adhesive was 31.6% with a p-value of 0.047 which showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference of clinical failure rate of lingual retainers bonded with conventional bonding adhesive versus primerless flowable adhesive with greater failure rate of the primerless flowable adhesive.
format	article
author	Faheem Nake Akhtar Abdullah Jan Sana Tariq Mehwish Khan Munazza Saeed
author_facet	Faheem Nake Akhtar Abdullah Jan Sana Tariq Mehwish Khan Munazza Saeed
author_sort	Faheem Nake Akhtar
title	COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
title_short	COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
title_full	COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
title_fullStr	COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
title_full_unstemmed	COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES
title_sort	comparison of clinical failures of lingual retainers bonded with primerless flowable adhesives versus conventional bonding adhesives
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2021
url	https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.3575 https://doaj.org/article/b72149a838ae4d2d8deb2918fd39c4b4
work_keys_str_mv	AT faheemnakeakhtar comparisonofclinicalfailuresoflingualretainersbondedwithprimerlessflowableadhesivesversusconventionalbondingadhesives AT abdullahjan comparisonofclinicalfailuresoflingualretainersbondedwithprimerlessflowableadhesivesversusconventionalbondingadhesives AT sanatariq comparisonofclinicalfailuresoflingualretainersbondedwithprimerlessflowableadhesivesversusconventionalbondingadhesives AT mehwishkhan comparisonofclinicalfailuresoflingualretainersbondedwithprimerlessflowableadhesivesversusconventionalbondingadhesives AT munazzasaeed comparisonofclinicalfailuresoflingualretainersbondedwithprimerlessflowableadhesivesversusconventionalbondingadhesives
_version_	1718383476654211072

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FAILURES OF LINGUAL RETAINERS BONDED WITH PRIMERLESS FLOWABLE ADHESIVES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONDING ADHESIVES

Ejemplares similares