Editorial

As this issue goes to press, the Muslim world is reeling from a number of events: President Bush has reversed decades of American foreign policy to come out in favor of Israel’s annexation of huge swaths of the West Bank; Israel continues to murder top Hamas leaders in Palestine; in Afghanistan, Ka...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katherine Bullock
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b7296144275c4d4eb09134a39d3659e5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b7296144275c4d4eb09134a39d3659e5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b7296144275c4d4eb09134a39d3659e52021-12-02T17:49:44ZEditorial10.35632/ajis.v21i2.17922690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/b7296144275c4d4eb09134a39d3659e52004-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1792https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 As this issue goes to press, the Muslim world is reeling from a number of events: President Bush has reversed decades of American foreign policy to come out in favor of Israel’s annexation of huge swaths of the West Bank; Israel continues to murder top Hamas leaders in Palestine; in Afghanistan, Karzai is having trouble administering a country that is slipping back to the pre-Taliban war-lord era, and violence continues to escalate in an increasingly destabilized Iraq. Bush’s insistence that the so-called “war on terror” is for the sake of freedom rings increasingly hollow, and the United States, under his administration, appears to be a major catalyst for instability rather than stability in the world. When I think of Bush and his team, I cannot help but recall the Qur’anic verse that says: “When it is said to them: ‘Make not mischief on the earth,’ they say: ‘We are only ones that put things right.’ Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, but they realize (it) not” (2:11-12). The Bush administration’s responses to the tragic carnage of 9/11 has unleashed mayhem in the Muslim world that is reminiscent not of the twentieth century, but of the nineteenth, in which the European powers attempted to colonize the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Thus, Salem’s article, in a finely nuanced analysis of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani’s and Rashid Rida’s responses to European colonialism, has reverberations in today’s climate. Salem’s main argument is that al-Afghani and Rida advanced similar political programs on three different levels: fighting colonialism, establishing modern Islamic states, and calling for itjihad in the interpretation and implementation of Islamic law. It is hard not to see the Muslim world’s present condition reflected in their struggles nearly a century ago, and thus to feel a special relevance in studying the lives and works of these two influential nineteenth-century figures. What were the issues they reflected upon? What were their conclusions, observations, and suggestions? What worked and did not work for them? Salem’s article is very instructive in this regard. One of the thorniest issues alal-Afghani and Rida attempted to address was the relationship and compatibility between a modern nation-state and an Islamic state. To what extent were these complementary or ... Katherine BullockInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2004)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Katherine Bullock
Editorial
description As this issue goes to press, the Muslim world is reeling from a number of events: President Bush has reversed decades of American foreign policy to come out in favor of Israel’s annexation of huge swaths of the West Bank; Israel continues to murder top Hamas leaders in Palestine; in Afghanistan, Karzai is having trouble administering a country that is slipping back to the pre-Taliban war-lord era, and violence continues to escalate in an increasingly destabilized Iraq. Bush’s insistence that the so-called “war on terror” is for the sake of freedom rings increasingly hollow, and the United States, under his administration, appears to be a major catalyst for instability rather than stability in the world. When I think of Bush and his team, I cannot help but recall the Qur’anic verse that says: “When it is said to them: ‘Make not mischief on the earth,’ they say: ‘We are only ones that put things right.’ Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, but they realize (it) not” (2:11-12). The Bush administration’s responses to the tragic carnage of 9/11 has unleashed mayhem in the Muslim world that is reminiscent not of the twentieth century, but of the nineteenth, in which the European powers attempted to colonize the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Thus, Salem’s article, in a finely nuanced analysis of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani’s and Rashid Rida’s responses to European colonialism, has reverberations in today’s climate. Salem’s main argument is that al-Afghani and Rida advanced similar political programs on three different levels: fighting colonialism, establishing modern Islamic states, and calling for itjihad in the interpretation and implementation of Islamic law. It is hard not to see the Muslim world’s present condition reflected in their struggles nearly a century ago, and thus to feel a special relevance in studying the lives and works of these two influential nineteenth-century figures. What were the issues they reflected upon? What were their conclusions, observations, and suggestions? What worked and did not work for them? Salem’s article is very instructive in this regard. One of the thorniest issues alal-Afghani and Rida attempted to address was the relationship and compatibility between a modern nation-state and an Islamic state. To what extent were these complementary or ...
format article
author Katherine Bullock
author_facet Katherine Bullock
author_sort Katherine Bullock
title Editorial
title_short Editorial
title_full Editorial
title_fullStr Editorial
title_full_unstemmed Editorial
title_sort editorial
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2004
url https://doaj.org/article/b7296144275c4d4eb09134a39d3659e5
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinebullock editorial
_version_ 1718379370430595072