Detectability of pulmonary ossifications in fibrotic lung on ultra-high-resolution CT using 2048 matrix size and 0.25-mm slice thickness
Abstract To investigate the prevalence of nodular pulmonary ossifications (POs) in patients with honeycombing on ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) and to compare the detectability of nodular POs between images reconstructed using the ultra-high-resolution setting (UHR-setting) and those using the con...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b72efe5c600c405b9b0ffe656801aefa |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Abstract To investigate the prevalence of nodular pulmonary ossifications (POs) in patients with honeycombing on ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) and to compare the detectability of nodular POs between images reconstructed using the ultra-high-resolution setting (UHR-setting) and those using the conventional setting (C-setting) on UHRCT. Twenty patients with honeycombing in the lung were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced UHRCT. Images were reconstructed with UHR-setting (matrix, 2048 × 2048; slice thickness, 0.25 mm) and with C-setting (matrix size, 512 × 512; slice thickness, 0.5 mm). Two chest radiologists independently recorded the number of nodular POs (< 4 mm diameter) in each lung lobes. Each lobe was classified as one of the following five categories according to the number of POs: C0, none; C1, 1–4 POs; C2, 5–9 POs; C3, 10–49 POs; and C4, ≥ 50 POs. The maximum CT values of the POs were measured and compared between the two settings. PO categories were significantly higher with UHR-setting than with C-setting (p < 0.001). Maximum CT values were significantly higher with UHR-setting than with C-setting (p < 0.001). Nodular POs were seen in 80% or more of patients with honeycombing and more easily detected in images reconstructed with UHR-setting than in those with C-setting. |
|---|