Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not

ABSTRACT In their study published in January 2013 in mBio, Fang et al. reviewed records from the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and found more cases of scientific misconduct committed by men than women, particularly by faculty (F. C. Fang, J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall, mBio 4:1–3, 2013). Pow...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anna Kaatz, Paul N. Vogelman, Molly Carnes
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b4733857
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b4733857
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b47338572021-11-15T15:40:29ZAre Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not10.1128/mBio.00156-132150-7511https://doaj.org/article/b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b47338572013-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00156-13https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT In their study published in January 2013 in mBio, Fang et al. reviewed records from the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and found more cases of scientific misconduct committed by men than women, particularly by faculty (F. C. Fang, J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall, mBio 4:1–3, 2013). Powerful social norms shape the way men and women behave, and implicit gender schemas can lead to different evaluation standards for men and women for tasks stereotypically linked to one gender. It is possible that norms for acceptable male and female behavior could lead to a lower threshold for men than women to engage in the risky behavior of scientific misconduct. It is also possible that women and men commit scientific fraud at the same rate but that, because crime is a male-gendered domain, evaluators require more proof of the criminal “competence” of women for an investigation to rise to the level of an ORI case or that female gender norms for likeability and a lower apology threshold more often prevent escalation of women’s fraud beyond a local level. Male scientists also have more opportunity to commit fraud than female scientists because they receive more NIH research funding—a finding that may also be influenced by gender schemas. We cannot conclude from the ORI data that men are more likely than women to risk the consequences of committing scientific misconduct simply because risk taking aligns with male gender stereotypes. Neither can we conclude that because men are more likely than women to commit fraud in other contexts, men are also more likely than women to commit scientific fraud. We can conclude, however, that scientific misconduct, regardless of who commits it, diminishes all who contribute to the scientific enterprise.Anna KaatzPaul N. VogelmanMolly CarnesAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle Microbiology
QR1-502
Anna Kaatz
Paul N. Vogelman
Molly Carnes
Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
description ABSTRACT In their study published in January 2013 in mBio, Fang et al. reviewed records from the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and found more cases of scientific misconduct committed by men than women, particularly by faculty (F. C. Fang, J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall, mBio 4:1–3, 2013). Powerful social norms shape the way men and women behave, and implicit gender schemas can lead to different evaluation standards for men and women for tasks stereotypically linked to one gender. It is possible that norms for acceptable male and female behavior could lead to a lower threshold for men than women to engage in the risky behavior of scientific misconduct. It is also possible that women and men commit scientific fraud at the same rate but that, because crime is a male-gendered domain, evaluators require more proof of the criminal “competence” of women for an investigation to rise to the level of an ORI case or that female gender norms for likeability and a lower apology threshold more often prevent escalation of women’s fraud beyond a local level. Male scientists also have more opportunity to commit fraud than female scientists because they receive more NIH research funding—a finding that may also be influenced by gender schemas. We cannot conclude from the ORI data that men are more likely than women to risk the consequences of committing scientific misconduct simply because risk taking aligns with male gender stereotypes. Neither can we conclude that because men are more likely than women to commit fraud in other contexts, men are also more likely than women to commit scientific fraud. We can conclude, however, that scientific misconduct, regardless of who commits it, diminishes all who contribute to the scientific enterprise.
format article
author Anna Kaatz
Paul N. Vogelman
Molly Carnes
author_facet Anna Kaatz
Paul N. Vogelman
Molly Carnes
author_sort Anna Kaatz
title Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
title_short Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
title_full Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
title_fullStr Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
title_full_unstemmed Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
title_sort are men more likely than women to commit scientific misconduct? maybe, maybe not
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b4733857
work_keys_str_mv AT annakaatz aremenmorelikelythanwomentocommitscientificmisconductmaybemaybenot
AT paulnvogelman aremenmorelikelythanwomentocommitscientificmisconductmaybemaybenot
AT mollycarnes aremenmorelikelythanwomentocommitscientificmisconductmaybemaybenot
_version_ 1718427725250691072