Brinzolamide 1%/timolol versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: prospective randomized patient-preference study

Romeo Altafini,1 Maria-Luise Scherzer,2 Douglas A Hubatsch,3 Paolo Frezzotti4 1Glaucoma Segment Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, Vicenza, Italy; 2Private Practice, Regenstauf, Germany; 3Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 4Ophthalmic Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Ita...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altafini R, Scherzer ML, Hubatsch DA, Frezzotti P
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b75fbe31e7f5461badc301a03f8b8655
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Romeo Altafini,1 Maria-Luise Scherzer,2 Douglas A Hubatsch,3 Paolo Frezzotti4 1Glaucoma Segment Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, Vicenza, Italy; 2Private Practice, Regenstauf, Germany; 3Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 4Ophthalmic Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess preference for fixed-combination brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% (BTFC) versus fixed-combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (DTFC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.Methods: In this prospective, single-masked crossover study, patients were randomized 1:1 to BTFC-DTFC or DTFC-BTFC treatment sequences. Patients self-administered each medication for 7 days, with a 48-hour washout period between treatments, and rated ocular discomfort after each treatment period. Medication preferences based on ocular comfort (primary endpoint) and anticipated adherence were assessed. Safety outcomes included adverse events and intraocular pressure. Between-group differences in treatment preference and ocular discomfort scores were analyzed using chi-square and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests, respectively. Adherence, intraocular pressure, and adverse events were summarized descriptively.Results: In total, 112 patients were enrolled (mean ± SD age, 66±11 years), and 109 patients completed the study. Numerically, more patients in the intent-to-treat dataset preferred BTFC versus DTFC (59.3% versus 40.7%); however, this result was not statistically significant (treatment difference, 18.6%; P=0.0670). Mean ocular discomfort scores (range, 0–9) were statistically significantly lower with BTFC versus DTFC (2.6 versus 3.7; P=0.0002, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test). More patients who preferred BTFC over DTFC were confident that they would adhere to their preferred medication. Treatment-related adverse events included blurred vision with BTFC and eye irritation or eye pain with DTFC.Conclusion: BTFC and DTFC were preferred by approximately 60% and 40% of patients, respectively, and BTFC was associated with less patient-reported ocular discomfort. Greater ocular comfort of glaucoma medications may improve treatment adherence. Keywords: brinzolamide, dorzolamide, fixed combination, ocular discomfort, patient preference