Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress

Abstract The neurobiological literature implicates chronic stress induced decision-making deficits as a major contributor to depression and anxiety. Given that females are twice as likely to suffer from these disorders, we hypothesized the existence of sex difference in the effects of chronic stress...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huijie Lei, Yasuhiro Mochizuki, Chong Chen, Kosuke Hagiwara, Masako Hirotsu, Toshio Matsubara, Shin Nakagawa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b790b6e0691144cfa610f1331b5d73b2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b790b6e0691144cfa610f1331b5d73b2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b790b6e0691144cfa610f1331b5d73b22021-12-02T13:39:34ZSex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress10.1038/s41598-021-88155-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/b790b6e0691144cfa610f1331b5d73b22021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88155-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The neurobiological literature implicates chronic stress induced decision-making deficits as a major contributor to depression and anxiety. Given that females are twice as likely to suffer from these disorders, we hypothesized the existence of sex difference in the effects of chronic stress on decision-making. Here employing a decision-making paradigm that relies on reinforcement learning of probabilistic predictive relationships, we show female volunteers with a high level of perceived stress in the past month are more likely to make suboptimal choices than males. Computational characterizations of this sex difference suggest that while under high stress, females and males differ in their weighting but not learning of the expected uncertainty in the predictive relationships. These findings provide a mechanistic account of the sex difference in decision-making under chronic stress and may have important implications for the epidemiology of sex difference in depression and anxiety.Huijie LeiYasuhiro MochizukiChong ChenKosuke HagiwaraMasako HirotsuToshio MatsubaraShin NakagawaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Huijie Lei
Yasuhiro Mochizuki
Chong Chen
Kosuke Hagiwara
Masako Hirotsu
Toshio Matsubara
Shin Nakagawa
Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
description Abstract The neurobiological literature implicates chronic stress induced decision-making deficits as a major contributor to depression and anxiety. Given that females are twice as likely to suffer from these disorders, we hypothesized the existence of sex difference in the effects of chronic stress on decision-making. Here employing a decision-making paradigm that relies on reinforcement learning of probabilistic predictive relationships, we show female volunteers with a high level of perceived stress in the past month are more likely to make suboptimal choices than males. Computational characterizations of this sex difference suggest that while under high stress, females and males differ in their weighting but not learning of the expected uncertainty in the predictive relationships. These findings provide a mechanistic account of the sex difference in decision-making under chronic stress and may have important implications for the epidemiology of sex difference in depression and anxiety.
format article
author Huijie Lei
Yasuhiro Mochizuki
Chong Chen
Kosuke Hagiwara
Masako Hirotsu
Toshio Matsubara
Shin Nakagawa
author_facet Huijie Lei
Yasuhiro Mochizuki
Chong Chen
Kosuke Hagiwara
Masako Hirotsu
Toshio Matsubara
Shin Nakagawa
author_sort Huijie Lei
title Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
title_short Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
title_full Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
title_fullStr Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
title_full_unstemmed Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
title_sort sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b790b6e0691144cfa610f1331b5d73b2
work_keys_str_mv AT huijielei sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT yasuhiromochizuki sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT chongchen sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT kosukehagiwara sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT masakohirotsu sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT toshiomatsubara sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
AT shinnakagawa sexdifferenceintheweightingofexpecteduncertaintyunderchronicstress
_version_ 1718392640395804672