Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed lit...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c52021-11-06T10:08:49ZUpdate of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China1606-97491607-079810.2166/ws.2021.087https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c52021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ws.iwaponline.com/content/21/6/3153https://doaj.org/toc/1606-9749https://doaj.org/toc/1607-0798Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed literature. We propose an indicator system, weight, and criteria, validated by nine case studies and able to assess the country-scale river health. Our analysis shows that the rule layer of indicator system includes hydrology, water quality, aquatic organism, physical habitats, and functional service; its corresponding weights are set to 0.15, 0.21, 0.18, 0.22, and 0.24, respectively. The ten most representative indicators are selected that incorporates the indicator layer with their corresponding weights. The evaluation based on case studies shows that in eight out of nine cases, our results are consistent with those obtained in previous studies. Therefore, the suggested index system, weight, and three-assessment criteria are well suited for the complex cases in China. This paper can serve as a reference for a river health assessment and present a comprehensive listing of assessment criteria. HIGHLIGHTS We popose an indicator system which can provide an objective and universally applicable way to evaluate river health.; We classify the rivers into three types, and the corresponding assignment criteria are proposed, respectively. With this method, the health status of rivers of different types can be determined more accurately and compared horizontally.;Yin LiuHuidong SuShuanghu ZhangTiantian JinIWA Publishingarticleassessment criteriaindicatorriver healthweightWater supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506ENWater Supply, Vol 21, Iss 6, Pp 3153-3167 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
assessment criteria indicator river health weight Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes TD201-500 River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) TC401-506 |
spellingShingle |
assessment criteria indicator river health weight Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes TD201-500 River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) TC401-506 Yin Liu Huidong Su Shuanghu Zhang Tiantian Jin Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
description |
Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed literature. We propose an indicator system, weight, and criteria, validated by nine case studies and able to assess the country-scale river health. Our analysis shows that the rule layer of indicator system includes hydrology, water quality, aquatic organism, physical habitats, and functional service; its corresponding weights are set to 0.15, 0.21, 0.18, 0.22, and 0.24, respectively. The ten most representative indicators are selected that incorporates the indicator layer with their corresponding weights. The evaluation based on case studies shows that in eight out of nine cases, our results are consistent with those obtained in previous studies. Therefore, the suggested index system, weight, and three-assessment criteria are well suited for the complex cases in China. This paper can serve as a reference for a river health assessment and present a comprehensive listing of assessment criteria. HIGHLIGHTS
We popose an indicator system which can provide an objective and universally applicable way to evaluate river health.;
We classify the rivers into three types, and the corresponding assignment criteria are proposed, respectively. With this method, the health status of rivers of different types can be determined more accurately and compared horizontally.; |
format |
article |
author |
Yin Liu Huidong Su Shuanghu Zhang Tiantian Jin |
author_facet |
Yin Liu Huidong Su Shuanghu Zhang Tiantian Jin |
author_sort |
Yin Liu |
title |
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
title_short |
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
title_full |
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
title_fullStr |
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China |
title_sort |
update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in china |
publisher |
IWA Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yinliu updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina AT huidongsu updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina AT shuanghuzhang updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina AT tiantianjin updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina |
_version_ |
1718443816947548160 |