Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China

Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed lit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin Liu, Huidong Su, Shuanghu Zhang, Tiantian Jin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c52021-11-06T10:08:49ZUpdate of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China1606-97491607-079810.2166/ws.2021.087https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c52021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ws.iwaponline.com/content/21/6/3153https://doaj.org/toc/1606-9749https://doaj.org/toc/1607-0798Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed literature. We propose an indicator system, weight, and criteria, validated by nine case studies and able to assess the country-scale river health. Our analysis shows that the rule layer of indicator system includes hydrology, water quality, aquatic organism, physical habitats, and functional service; its corresponding weights are set to 0.15, 0.21, 0.18, 0.22, and 0.24, respectively. The ten most representative indicators are selected that incorporates the indicator layer with their corresponding weights. The evaluation based on case studies shows that in eight out of nine cases, our results are consistent with those obtained in previous studies. Therefore, the suggested index system, weight, and three-assessment criteria are well suited for the complex cases in China. This paper can serve as a reference for a river health assessment and present a comprehensive listing of assessment criteria. HIGHLIGHTS We popose an indicator system which can provide an objective and universally applicable way to evaluate river health.; We classify the rivers into three types, and the corresponding assignment criteria are proposed, respectively. With this method, the health status of rivers of different types can be determined more accurately and compared horizontally.;Yin LiuHuidong SuShuanghu ZhangTiantian JinIWA Publishingarticleassessment criteriaindicatorriver healthweightWater supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506ENWater Supply, Vol 21, Iss 6, Pp 3153-3167 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic assessment criteria
indicator
river health
weight
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
spellingShingle assessment criteria
indicator
river health
weight
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Yin Liu
Huidong Su
Shuanghu Zhang
Tiantian Jin
Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
description Comprehensive assessment of river health is challenging due to the diversity of rivers, the complexity of their ecosystem and functional service. This paper updates the river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China by reviewing and examining the peer-reviewed literature. We propose an indicator system, weight, and criteria, validated by nine case studies and able to assess the country-scale river health. Our analysis shows that the rule layer of indicator system includes hydrology, water quality, aquatic organism, physical habitats, and functional service; its corresponding weights are set to 0.15, 0.21, 0.18, 0.22, and 0.24, respectively. The ten most representative indicators are selected that incorporates the indicator layer with their corresponding weights. The evaluation based on case studies shows that in eight out of nine cases, our results are consistent with those obtained in previous studies. Therefore, the suggested index system, weight, and three-assessment criteria are well suited for the complex cases in China. This paper can serve as a reference for a river health assessment and present a comprehensive listing of assessment criteria. HIGHLIGHTS We popose an indicator system which can provide an objective and universally applicable way to evaluate river health.; We classify the rivers into three types, and the corresponding assignment criteria are proposed, respectively. With this method, the health status of rivers of different types can be determined more accurately and compared horizontally.;
format article
author Yin Liu
Huidong Su
Shuanghu Zhang
Tiantian Jin
author_facet Yin Liu
Huidong Su
Shuanghu Zhang
Tiantian Jin
author_sort Yin Liu
title Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
title_short Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
title_full Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
title_fullStr Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
title_full_unstemmed Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China
title_sort update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in china
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/b7a2ab550ce445e49e7c156c633f46c5
work_keys_str_mv AT yinliu updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina
AT huidongsu updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina
AT shuanghuzhang updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina
AT tiantianjin updateofriverhealthassessmentindicatorsystemweightandassignmentcriteriainchina
_version_ 1718443816947548160