To be is to be perceived, not to be is not to be perceived
Can we say that to be is to be perceived? Or that not to be is not to be perceived? Who decides who is to be visible or not? My contention is that invisibility is a social construction related to norms of apprehension, recognition and justification. Not seeing a person makes them absent, and precipi...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | Guillaume Le Blanc |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN FR |
Publié: |
Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/b7be3fea55004a8384b1494c3ae7148e |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Introduction: Invisible Lives, Silent Voices in the British Literature, Arts and Culture of the 20th and 21st Centuries
par: Alice Borrego, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Glaring Invisibilities and Loud Silences in ‘The Gipsy’s Baby’ by Rosamond Lehmann
par: Florence Marie
Publié: (2021) -
Unseeing People: Towards a Clear View of Invisible Characters in Narrative Fiction
par: Gero Guttzeit
Publié: (2021) -
‘Some believe the men become ghosts, haunting the facades they helped building’: Subaltern Figures and Spectral Metaphors in Sunjeev Sahota, The Year of the Runaways (2015), and Deepak Unnikrishnan’s Temporary People (2017)
par: Jaine Chemmachery
Publié: (2021) -
Marie-Luise Kohlke and Christian Gutleben, eds., Neo-Victorian Biofiction. Reimagining Nineteenth-Century Historical Subjects
par: Georges Letissier
Publié: (2021)