Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.

<h4>Background</h4>Conserving animal populations in places where human activity is increasing is an ongoing challenge in many parts of the world. We investigated how human activity interacted with maternal status and individual variation in behavior to affect reliability of spatially-exp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthew R Dzialak, Seth M Harju, Robert G Osborn, John J Wondzell, Larry D Hayden-Wing, Jeffrey B Winstead, Stephen L Webb
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/b7e0853abda34652b3bdc85f186df9e5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:b7e0853abda34652b3bdc85f186df9e5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:b7e0853abda34652b3bdc85f186df9e52021-11-18T06:59:53ZPrioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0014597https://doaj.org/article/b7e0853abda34652b3bdc85f186df9e52011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21297866/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Conserving animal populations in places where human activity is increasing is an ongoing challenge in many parts of the world. We investigated how human activity interacted with maternal status and individual variation in behavior to affect reliability of spatially-explicit models intended to guide conservation of critical ungulate calving resources. We studied Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus) that occupy a region where 2900 natural gas wells have been drilled.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We present novel applications of generalized additive modeling to predict maternal status based on movement, and of random-effects resource selection models to provide population and individual-based inference on the effects of maternal status and human activity. We used a 2×2 factorial design (treatment vs. control) that included elk that were either parturient or non-parturient and in areas either with or without industrial development. Generalized additive models predicted maternal status (parturiency) correctly 93% of the time based on movement. Human activity played a larger role than maternal status in shaping resource use; elk showed strong spatiotemporal patterns of selection or avoidance and marked individual variation in developed areas, but no such pattern in undeveloped areas. This difference had direct consequences for landscape-level conservation planning. When relative probability of use was calculated across the study area, there was disparity throughout 72-88% of the landscape in terms of where conservation intervention should be prioritized depending on whether models were based on behavior in developed areas or undeveloped areas. Model validation showed that models based on behavior in developed areas had poor predictive accuracy, whereas the model based on behavior in undeveloped areas had high predictive accuracy.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>By directly testing for differences between developed and undeveloped areas, and by modeling resource selection in a random-effects framework that provided individual-based inference, we conclude that: 1) amplified selection or avoidance behavior and individual variation, as responses to increasing human activity, complicate conservation planning in multiple-use landscapes, and 2) resource selection behavior in places where human activity is predictable or less dynamic may provide a more reliable basis from which to prioritize conservation action.Matthew R DzialakSeth M HarjuRobert G OsbornJohn J WondzellLarry D Hayden-WingJeffrey B WinsteadStephen L WebbPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 1, p e14597 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Matthew R Dzialak
Seth M Harju
Robert G Osborn
John J Wondzell
Larry D Hayden-Wing
Jeffrey B Winstead
Stephen L Webb
Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
description <h4>Background</h4>Conserving animal populations in places where human activity is increasing is an ongoing challenge in many parts of the world. We investigated how human activity interacted with maternal status and individual variation in behavior to affect reliability of spatially-explicit models intended to guide conservation of critical ungulate calving resources. We studied Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus) that occupy a region where 2900 natural gas wells have been drilled.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We present novel applications of generalized additive modeling to predict maternal status based on movement, and of random-effects resource selection models to provide population and individual-based inference on the effects of maternal status and human activity. We used a 2×2 factorial design (treatment vs. control) that included elk that were either parturient or non-parturient and in areas either with or without industrial development. Generalized additive models predicted maternal status (parturiency) correctly 93% of the time based on movement. Human activity played a larger role than maternal status in shaping resource use; elk showed strong spatiotemporal patterns of selection or avoidance and marked individual variation in developed areas, but no such pattern in undeveloped areas. This difference had direct consequences for landscape-level conservation planning. When relative probability of use was calculated across the study area, there was disparity throughout 72-88% of the landscape in terms of where conservation intervention should be prioritized depending on whether models were based on behavior in developed areas or undeveloped areas. Model validation showed that models based on behavior in developed areas had poor predictive accuracy, whereas the model based on behavior in undeveloped areas had high predictive accuracy.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>By directly testing for differences between developed and undeveloped areas, and by modeling resource selection in a random-effects framework that provided individual-based inference, we conclude that: 1) amplified selection or avoidance behavior and individual variation, as responses to increasing human activity, complicate conservation planning in multiple-use landscapes, and 2) resource selection behavior in places where human activity is predictable or less dynamic may provide a more reliable basis from which to prioritize conservation action.
format article
author Matthew R Dzialak
Seth M Harju
Robert G Osborn
John J Wondzell
Larry D Hayden-Wing
Jeffrey B Winstead
Stephen L Webb
author_facet Matthew R Dzialak
Seth M Harju
Robert G Osborn
John J Wondzell
Larry D Hayden-Wing
Jeffrey B Winstead
Stephen L Webb
author_sort Matthew R Dzialak
title Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
title_short Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
title_full Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
title_fullStr Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
title_sort prioritizing conservation of ungulate calving resources in multiple-use landscapes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/b7e0853abda34652b3bdc85f186df9e5
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewrdzialak prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT sethmharju prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT robertgosborn prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT johnjwondzell prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT larrydhaydenwing prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT jeffreybwinstead prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
AT stephenlwebb prioritizingconservationofungulatecalvingresourcesinmultipleuselandscapes
_version_ 1718424128371818496