Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?

Does the doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies contradict democracy? The King’s Two Bodies in the Carnival of Democracy In my paper, I will try to show that the medieval doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies could have been a significant support for the Carnival of Democracy as described by L. Koczanowic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:	Dwa Ciała Króla karnawał demokracji polityka dialogu rytuały polityczne Pałac Westminsterski Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b81cc5cabd634249a975e9e8cd1d2e81
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b81cc5cabd634249a975e9e8cd1d2e81
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b81cc5cabd634249a975e9e8cd1d2e812021-11-27T13:07:12ZCzy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.041733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/b81cc5cabd634249a975e9e8cd1d2e812021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2094https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Does the doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies contradict democracy? The King’s Two Bodies in the Carnival of Democracy In my paper, I will try to show that the medieval doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies could have been a significant support for the Carnival of Democracy as described by L. Koczanowicz in his Politics of Dialogue. I critically refer to the author’s thesis that the doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies has a totalitarian character. I do this, however, on the very same grounds that Koczanowicz uses to develop his vision of non‑consensual democracy – one that is built on emotions, empathy and customs. In my view, the doctrine of King’s Two Bodies not only does not contradict this vision but supports it. It does so by conceptualization of the idea of power as an empty space (C. Lefort) and thus enables the development of numerous (proto)democratic practices in politics and law. These practices take shape of ceremonies of humiliating those in power – so important for Koczanowicz in his vision of Democratic Carnival. As an example of these practices I will refer to the annual ceremony of the State Opening of the UK Parliament, as well as other institutions that were developed in England/UK – as guarantees of the democratic rule of law – and were possible thanks to the idea of the King’s Two Bodies. Michał Zabdyr-JamrózKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleDwa Ciała Królakarnawał demokracjipolityka dialogurytuały politycznePałac WestminsterskiLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 13, Iss 45 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	Dwa Ciała Króla karnawał demokracji polityka dialogu rytuały polityczne Pałac Westminsterski Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	Dwa Ciała Króla karnawał demokracji polityka dialogu rytuały polityczne Pałac Westminsterski Law K Political science J Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
description	Does the doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies contradict democracy? The King’s Two Bodies in the Carnival of Democracy In my paper, I will try to show that the medieval doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies could have been a significant support for the Carnival of Democracy as described by L. Koczanowicz in his Politics of Dialogue. I critically refer to the author’s thesis that the doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies has a totalitarian character. I do this, however, on the very same grounds that Koczanowicz uses to develop his vision of non‑consensual democracy – one that is built on emotions, empathy and customs. In my view, the doctrine of King’s Two Bodies not only does not contradict this vision but supports it. It does so by conceptualization of the idea of power as an empty space (C. Lefort) and thus enables the development of numerous (proto)democratic practices in politics and law. These practices take shape of ceremonies of humiliating those in power – so important for Koczanowicz in his vision of Democratic Carnival. As an example of these practices I will refer to the annual ceremony of the State Opening of the UK Parliament, as well as other institutions that were developed in England/UK – as guarantees of the democratic rule of law – and were possible thanks to the idea of the King’s Two Bodies.
format	article
author	Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz
author_facet	Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz
author_sort	Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz
title	Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
title_short	Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
title_full	Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
title_fullStr	Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
title_full_unstemmed	Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
title_sort	czy doktryna dwóch ciał króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b81cc5cabd634249a975e9e8cd1d2e81
work_keys_str_mv	AT michałzabdyrjamroz czydoktrynadwochciałkrolajestzaprzeczeniemdemokracji
_version_	1718408765145874432

Czy doktryna Dwóch Ciał Króla jest zaprzeczeniem demokracji ?

Ejemplares similares